In supervised machine learning, the choice of loss function implicitly assumes a particular noise distribution over the data. For example, the frequently used mean squared error (MSE) loss assumes a Gaussian noise distribution. The choice of loss function during training and testing affects the performance of artificial neural networks (ANNs). It is known that MSE may yield substandard performance in the presence of outliers. The Cauchy loss function (CLF) assumes a Cauchy noise distribution, and is therefore potentially better suited for data with outliers. This papers aims to determine the extent of robustness and generalisability of the CLF as compared to MSE. CLF and MSE are assessed on a few handcrafted regression problems, and a real-world regression problem with artificially simulated outliers, in the context of ANN training. CLF yielded results that were either comparable to or better than the results yielded by MSE, with a few notable exceptions.

Recent work on predicting category structure with distributional models, using either static word embeddings (Heyman and Heyman, 2019) or contextualized language models (CLMs) (Misra et al., 2021), report low correlations with human ratings, thus calling into question their plausibility as models of human semantic memory. In this work, we revisit this question testing a wider array of methods for probing CLMs for predicting typicality scores. Our experiments, using BERT (Devlin et al., 2018), show the importance of using the right type of CLM probes, as our best BERT-based typicality prediction methods substantially improve over previous works. Second, our results highlight the importance of polysemy in this task: our best results are obtained when using a disambiguation mechanism. Finally, additional experiments reveal that Information Contentbased WordNet (Miller, 1995), also endowed with disambiguation, match the performance of the best BERT-based method, and in fact capture complementary information, which can be combined with BERT to achieve enhanced typicality predictions.

As a result, they are often brittle and unable to adapt to new domains, can treat individuals or subgroups unfairly, and have limited ability to explain their actions or recommendations [197, 235] reducing the trust of human users [118]. Following this, a new area of research, trustworthy AI, has recently received much attention from several policymakers and other regulatory organizations. The resulting guidelines (e.g., [184, 186, 187]), introduced to increase trust in AI systems, make developing trustworthy AI not only a technical (research) and social endeavor but also an organizational and (legal) obligational requirement. In this paper, we set out to demonstrate, through an extensive survey, that causal modeling and reasoning is an emerging and very useful tool for enabling current AI systems to become trustworthy. Causality is the science of reasoning about causes and effects. Cause-and-effect relationships are central to how we make sense of the world around us, how we act upon it, and how we respond to changes in our environment. In AI, research in causality was pioneered by the Turing award winner Judea Pearl long back in his 1995 seminal paper [194]. Since then, many researchers have contributed to the development of a solid mathematical basis for causality; see, for example, the books [79, 196, 201], the survey [90] and seminal papers [197, 235].

Ongoing progress in computational intelligence (CI) has led to an increased desire to apply CI techniques for the purpose of improving software engineering processes, particularly software testing. Existing state-of-the-art automated software testing techniques focus on utilising search algorithms to discover input values that achieve high execution path coverage. These algorithms are trained on the same code that they intend to test, requiring instrumentation and lengthy search times to test each software component. This paper outlines a novel genetic programming framework, where the evolved solutions are not input values, but micro-programs that can repeatedly generate input values to efficiently explore a software component's input parameter domain. We also argue that our approach can be generalised such as to be applied to many different software systems, and is thus not specific to merely the particular software component on which it was trained.

The existence of external (``side'') semantic knowledge has been shown to result in more expressive computational event models. To enable the use of side information that may be noisy or missing, we propose a semi-supervised information bottleneck-based discrete latent variable model. We reparameterize the model's discrete variables with auxiliary continuous latent variables and a light-weight hierarchical structure. Our model is learned to minimize the mutual information between the observed data and optional side knowledge that is not already captured by the new, auxiliary variables. We theoretically show that our approach generalizes past approaches, and perform an empirical case study of our approach on event modeling. We corroborate our theoretical results with strong empirical experiments, showing that the proposed method outperforms previous proposed approaches on multiple datasets.

Generating text with autoregressive language models (LMs) is of great importance to many natural language processing (NLP) applications. Previous solutions for this task often produce text that contains degenerative expressions or lacks semantic consistency. Recently, Su et al. introduced a new decoding method, contrastive search, based on the isotropic representation space of the language model and obtained new state of the art on various benchmarks. Additionally, Su et al. argued that the representations of autoregressive LMs (e.g. GPT-2) are intrinsically anisotropic which is also shared by previous studies. Therefore, to ensure the language model follows an isotropic distribution, Su et al. proposed a contrastive learning scheme, SimCTG, which calibrates the language model's representations through additional training. In this study, we first answer the question: "Are autoregressive LMs really anisotropic?". To this end, we extensively evaluate the isotropy of LMs across 16 major languages. Surprisingly, we find that the anisotropic problem only exists in the two specific English GPT-2-small/medium models. On the other hand, all other evaluated LMs are naturally isotropic which is in contrast to the conclusion drawn by previous studies. Based on our findings, we further assess the contrastive search decoding method using off-the-shelf LMs on four generation tasks across 16 languages. Our experimental results demonstrate that contrastive search significantly outperforms previous decoding methods without any additional training. More notably, on 12 out of the 16 evaluated languages, contrastive search performs comparably with human-level performances as judged by human evaluations. Our code and other related resources are publicly available at https://github.com/yxuansu/Contrastive_Search_Is_What_You_Need.

Activation functions can have a significant impact on reducing the topological complexity of input data and therefore improve the performance of the model. Selecting a suitable activation function is an essential step in neural model design. However, the choice of activation function is seldom discussed or explored in Transformer-based language models. Their activation functions are chosen beforehand and then remain fixed from pre-training to fine-tuning. As a result, the inductive biases they imposed on models cannot be adjusted during this long life cycle. Moreover, subsequently developed models (e.g., RoBERTa, BART, and GPT-3) often follow up prior work (e.g., BERT) to use the same activation function without justification. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of using Rational Activation Function (RAF), a learnable activation function, in the Transformer architecture. In contrast to conventional, predefined activation functions, RAFs can adaptively learn optimal activation functions during training according to input data. Our experiments show the RAF-based Transformer (RAFT) achieves a lower validation perplexity than a vanilla BERT with the GELU function. We further evaluate RAFT on downstream tasks in low- and full-data settings. Our results show that RAFT outperforms the counterpart model across the majority of tasks and settings. For instance, RAFT outperforms vanilla BERT on the GLUE benchmark by 5.71 points on average in low-data scenario (where 100 training examples are available) and by 2.05 points on SQuAD in full-data setting. Analysis of the shapes of learned RAFs further unveils that they substantially vary between different layers of the pre-trained model and mostly look very different from conventional activation functions. RAFT opens a new research direction for analyzing and interpreting pre-trained models according to the learned activation functions.

Originally published on Towards AI. With ChatGPT blowing the internet, we are at a critical juncture that demands us to again ask hard questions about the impact of AI models on society, a conversation that starts but never ends. In this article, I aim to bring attention to the importance of knowing that, even though large AI models are impressive, there are often unacknowledged costs behind them. It is like saying " data is the new oil" to describe its value, but this analogy often ignores the costs of the oil and mining industries. To understand what AI is made from, we need to leave Silicon Valley and go to the place where the stuff for the AI industry is made. The term "artificial intelligence" may evoke the ideas of algorithms and data, but it is powered by the rare earth's minerals and resources that make up the computing components [1].

The study of stability and sensitivity of statistical methods or algorithms with respect to their data is an important problem in machine learning and statistics. The performance of the algorithm under resampling of the data is a fundamental way to measure its stability and is closely related to generalization or privacy of the algorithm. In this paper, we study the resampling sensitivity for the principal component analysis (PCA). Given an $ n \times p $ random matrix $ \mathbf{X} $, let $ \mathbf{X}^{[k]} $ be the matrix obtained from $ \mathbf{X} $ by resampling $ k $ randomly chosen entries of $ \mathbf{X} $. Let $ \mathbf{v} $ and $ \mathbf{v}^{[k]} $ denote the principal components of $ \mathbf{X} $ and $ \mathbf{X}^{[k]} $. In the proportional growth regime $ p/n \to \xi \in (0,1] $, we establish the sharp threshold for the sensitivity/stability transition of PCA. When $ k \gg n^{5/3} $, the principal components $ \mathbf{v} $ and $ \mathbf{v}^{[k]} $ are asymptotically orthogonal. On the other hand, when $ k \ll n^{5/3} $, the principal components $ \mathbf{v} $ and $ \mathbf{v}^{[k]} $ are asymptotically colinear. In words, we show that PCA is sensitive to the input data in the sense that resampling even a negligible portion of the input may completely change the output.

Understanding agent behaviour in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) is an important problem in domains such as autonomous driving, disaster response, and sports analytics. Existing MAS problems typically use uniform timesteps with observations for all agents. In this work, we analyse the problem of agent location imputation, specifically posed in environments with non-uniform timesteps and limited agent observability (~95% missing values). Our approach uses Long Short-Term Memory and Graph Neural Network components to learn temporal and inter-agent patterns to predict the location of all agents at every timestep. We apply this to the domain of football (soccer) by imputing the location of all players in a game from sparse event data (e.g., shots and passes). Our model estimates player locations to within ~6.9m; a ~62% reduction in error from the best performing baseline. This approach facilitates downstream analysis tasks such as player physical metrics, player coverage, and team pitch control. Existing solutions to these tasks often require optical tracking data, which is expensive to obtain and only available to elite clubs. By imputing player locations from easy to obtain event data, we increase the accessibility of downstream tasks.