zt 1
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Norfolk County > Norwood (0.04)
- Europe > Spain (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
LatentTemplateInductionwithGumbel-CRFs Appendix
Papandreou and Yuille[4] proposed the Perturb-and-MAP Random Field, an efficient sampling method forgeneral MarkovRandom Field. We compare the detailed structure of gradients of each estimator. All gradients are formed as a summation over the steps. The Gumbel-CRF and PM-MRF estimator can be decomposed with a pathwise term, where we take gradientoff w.r.t. Since the official test set is not publically available, we use the same training/ validation/ test split as Fu et al.[1].
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Tuscany > Florence (0.04)
- Asia > South Korea (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.05)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Berlin (0.04)
min
Recall thatx = argmina Ax>θ so x can be viewed as a deterministic functionθ . " log p(zn|θ) (1/|Nε|) P Since Rmax is the upper bound of maximum expected reward, the second term can be bounded 2Rmaxγ. We letΦ R|A| d as the feature matrix where each row ofΦrepresent each action inA. We summarize the procedure of estimating t,It inAlgorithm3. LetX denote the feasible set.
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Middlesex County > Piscataway (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts (0.04)