Goto

Collaborating Authors

 wrong event


Handling Label Noise via Instance-Level Difficulty Modeling and Dynamic Optimization

Zhang, Kuan, Chai, Chengliang, Xu, Jingzhe, Zhang, Chi, Han, Han, Yuan, Ye, Wang, Guoren, Cao, Lei

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Recent studies indicate that deep neural networks degrade in generalization performance under noisy supervision. Existing methods focus on isolating clean subsets or correcting noisy labels, facing limitations such as high computational costs, heavy hyperparameter tuning process, and coarse-grained optimization. To address these challenges, we propose a novel two-stage noisy learning framework that enables instance-level optimization through a dynamically weighted loss function, avoiding hyperparameter tuning. To obtain stable and accurate information about noise modeling, we introduce a simple yet effective metric, termed wrong event, which dynamically models the cleanliness and difficulty of individual samples while maintaining computational costs. Our framework first collects wrong event information and builds a strong base model. Then we perform noise-robust training on the base model, using a probabilistic model to handle the wrong event information of samples. Experiments on five synthetic and real-world LNL benchmarks demonstrate our method surpasses state-of-the-art methods in performance, achieves a nearly 75% reduction in computational time and improves model scalability.


Automatic Extraction of Relationships among Motivations, Emotions and Actions from Natural Language Texts

Yang, Fei

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We propose a new graph-based framework to reveal relationships among motivations, emotions and actions explicitly given natural language texts. A directed acyclic graph is designed to describe human's nature. Nurture beliefs are incorporated to connect outside events and the human's nature graph. No annotation resources are required due to the power of large language models. Amazon Fine Foods Reviews dataset is used as corpus and food-related motivations are focused. Totally 92,990 relationship graphs are generated, of which 63% make logical sense. We make further analysis to investigate error types for optimization direction in future research.