waveform synthesizer
AV2Wav: Diffusion-Based Re-synthesis from Continuous Self-supervised Features for Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement
Chou, Ju-Chieh, Chien, Chung-Ming, Livescu, Karen
Speech enhancement systems are typically trained using pairs of clean and noisy speech. In audio-visual speech enhancement (AVSE), there is not as much ground-truth clean data available; most audio-visual datasets are collected in real-world environments with background noise and reverberation, hampering the development of AVSE. In this work, we introduce AV2Wav, a resynthesis-based audio-visual speech enhancement approach that can generate clean speech despite the challenges of real-world training data. We obtain a subset of nearly clean speech from an audio-visual corpus using a neural quality estimator, and then train a diffusion model on this subset to generate waveforms conditioned on continuous speech representations from AV-HuBERT with noise-robust training. We use continuous rather than discrete representations to retain prosody and speaker information. With this vocoding task alone, the model can perform speech enhancement better than a masking-based baseline. We further fine-tune the diffusion model on clean/noisy utterance pairs to improve the performance. Our approach outperforms a masking-based baseline in terms of both automatic metrics and a human listening test and is close in quality to the target speech in the listening test. Audio samples can be found at https://home.ttic.edu/~jcchou/demo/avse/avse_demo.html.
Transferring neural speech waveform synthesizers to musical instrument sounds generation
Zhao, Yi, Wang, Xin, Juvela, Lauri, Yamagishi, Junichi
TRANSFERRING NEURAL SPEECH W A VEFORM SYNTHESIZERS TO MUSICAL INSTRUMENT SOUNDS GENERA TION Yi Zhao null Xin W ang null Lauri Juvela † Junichi Y amagishi null null National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan † Department of Signal Processing and Acoustics, Aalto University, Finland ABSTRACT Recent neural waveform synthesizers such as WaveNet, WaveGlow, and the neural-source-filter (NSF) model have shown good performance in speech synthesis despite their different methods of waveform generation. The similarity between speech and music audio synthesis techniques suggests interesting avenues to explore in terms of the best way to apply speech synthesizers in the music domain. This work compares three neural synthesizers used for musical instrument sounds generation under three scenarios: training from scratch on music data, zero-shot learning from the speech domain, and fine-tuning-based adaptation from the speech to the music domain. The results of a large-scale perceptual test demonstrated that the performance of three synthesizers improved when they were pre-trained on speech data and fine-tuned on music data, which indicates the usefulness of knowledge from speech data for music audio generation. Among the synthesizers, WaveGlow showed the best potential in zero-shot learning while NSF performed best in the other scenarios and could generate samples that were perceptually close to natural audio. Index T erms -- Neural waveform synthesizer, musical instrument sounds synthesis, zero-shot adaptation, fine-tuning 1. INTRODUCTION Many technological parallels can be drawn between the synthesis of speech and musical instruments, both historically and in the present deep learning era. Previously, concatenative techniques had been widely applied in text-to-speech (TTS) [1] and musical sound synthesis [2].