The paper proposes a dynamic method, Recursive SBDS(ReSBDS), for efficient partial symmetry breaking. Wefirst demonstrate how (partial) Symmetry BreakingDuring Search (SBDS) misses important pruning opportunitieswhen given only a subset of symmetries tobreak. The investigation pinpoints the culprit and in turnsuggests rectification. The main idea is to add extra conditionalconstraints during search recursively to prunealso symmetric nodes of some pruned subtrees. Thus,ReSBDS can break extra symmetry compositions, butis carefully designed to break only the ones that areeasy to identify and inexpensive to break. We presenttheorems to guarantee the soundness and terminationof our approach, and compare our method with popularstatic and dynamic methods. When the variable (value)heuristic is static, ReSBDS is also complete in eliminatingall interchangeable variables (values) given only thegenerator symmetries. Extensive experimentations confirmthe efficiency of ReSBDS, when compared againststate of the art methods.

Symmetry is an important problem in many combinatorial problems. One way of dealing with symmetry is to add constraints that eliminate symmetric solutions. We survey recent results in this area, focusing especially on two common and useful cases: symmetry breaking constraints for row and column symmetry, and symmetry breaking constraints for eliminating value symmetry.

Symmetry is an important problem in many combinatorial problems. One way of dealing with symmetry is to add constraints that eliminate symmetric solutions. We survey recent results in this area, focusing especially on two common and useful cases: symmetry breaking constraints for row and column symmetry, and symmetry breaking constraints for eliminating value symmetry.

This paper considers matrix models, a class of CSPs which generally exhibit significant symmetries. It proposed the idea of LexLeader feasibility checkers that verify, during search, whether the current partial assignment can be extended into a canonical solution. The feasibility checkers are based on a novel result by [Katsirelos et al., 2010] on how to check efficiently whether a solution is canonical. The paper generalizes this result to partial assignments, various variable orderings, and value symmetries. Empirical results on 5 standard benchmarks shows that feasibility checkers may bring significant performance gains, when jointly used with DoubleLex or SnakeLex.

Lazy clause generation is a powerful approach to reducing search in constraint programming. This is achieved by recording sets of domain restrictions that previously led to failure as new clausal propagators. Symmetry breaking approaches are also powerful methods for reducing search by recog- nizing that parts of the search tree are symmetric and do not need to be explored. In this paper we show how we can successfully combine symmetry breaking methods with lazy clause generation. Further, we show that the more precise nogoods generated by a lazy clause solver allow our combined approach to exploit redundancies that cannot be exploited via any previous symmetry breaking method, be it static or dynamic.

We consider a common type of symmetry where we have a matrix of decision variables with interchangeable rows and columns. A simple and efficient method to deal with such row and column symmetry is to post symmetry breaking constraints like DOUBLELEX and SNAKELEX. We provide a number of positive and negative results on posting such symmetry breaking constraints. On the positive side, we prove that we can compute in polynomial time a unique representative of an equivalence class in a matrix model with row and column symmetry if the number of rows (or of columns) is bounded and in a number of other special cases. On the negative side, we show that whilst DOUBLELEX and SNAKELEX are often effective in practice, they can leave a large number of symmetric solutions in the worst case. In addition, we prove that propagating DOUBLELEX completely is NP-hard. Finally we consider how to break row, column and value symmetry, correcting a result in the literature about the safeness of combining different symmetry breaking constraints. We end with the first experimental study on how much symmetry is left by DOUBLELEX and SNAKELEX on some benchmark problems.

Symmetry is an important feature of many constraint programs. We show that any symmetry acting on a set of symmetry breaking constraints can be used to break symmetry. Different symmetries pick out different solutions in each symmetry class. We use these observations in two methods for eliminating symmetry from a problem. These methods are designed to have many of the advantages of symmetry breaking methods that post static symmetry breaking constraint without some of the disadvantages. In particular, the two methods prune the search space using fast and efficient propagation of posted constraints, whilst reducing the conflict between symmetry breaking and branching heuristics. Experimental results show that the two methods perform well on some standard benchmarks.

One common type of symmetry is when values are symmetric. For example, if we are assigning colours (values) to nodes (variables) in a graph colouring problem then we can uniformly interchange the colours throughout a colouring. For a problem with value symmetries, all symmetric solutions can be eliminated in polynomial time. However, as we show here, both static and dynamic methods to deal with symmetry have computational limitations. With static methods, pruning all symmetric values is NP-hard in general. With dynamic methods, we can take exponential time on problems which static methods solve without search.

Symmetry is an important factor in solving many constraint satisfaction problems. One common type of symmetry is when we have symmetric values. In a recent series of papers, we have studied methods to break value symmetries. Our results identify computational limits on eliminating value symmetry. For instance, we prove that pruning all symmetric values is NP-hard in general. Nevertheless, experiments show that much value symmetry can be broken in practice. These results may be useful to researchers in planning, scheduling and other areas as value symmetry occurs in many different domains.