Positive-unlabeled (PU) learning addresses binary classification when only a set of labeled positives is available alongside a pool of unlabeled samples drawn from a mixture of positives and negatives. Existing PU methods typically require dataset-specific training or iterative optimization, which limits their applicability when many tasks must be solved quickly or with little tuning. We introduce PUICL, a pretrained transformer that solves PU classification entirely through in-context learning. PUICL is pretrained on synthetic PU datasets generated from randomly instantiated structural causal models, exposing it to a wide range of feature-label relationships and class-prior configurations. At inference time, PUICL receives the labeled positives and the unlabeled samples as a single input and returns class probabilities for the unlabeled rows in one forward pass, with no gradient updates or per-task fitting. On 20 semi-synthetic PU benchmarks derived from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, OpenML, and scikit-learn, PUICL outperforms four standard PU learning baselines in average AUC and accuracy, and is competitive on F1-score. These results show that the in-context learning paradigm extends naturally beyond fully supervised tabular prediction to the semi-supervised PU setting.

When modeling class-imbalanced data, it is crucial to address the imbalance, as models trained on such data tend to be biased towards the majority classes. This problem is amplified under partial supervision, where pseudo-labels for unlabeled data are predicted based on imbalanced labeled data, propagating the bias. While recent semi-supervised models address class imbalance, they typically assume single-modal input data. However, with the growing availability of multimodal data, it is essential to leverage complementary modalities. In this article, we propose a multimodal deep generative model for semi-supervised learning under class imbalance. Our approach uses separate encoders for each modality, sharing latent variables across modalities, and simplifies joint posterior computation with a product-of-experts method. To further address class imbalance, we replace typical Gaussian distributions with Student's t-distributions for the prior, encoder, and decoder, better capturing the heavy-tailed latent distributions in imbalanced data. We derive a new objective function for training the proposed model on both labeled and unlabeled data using $γ$-power divergence. Empirical results on benchmark and real-world datasets demonstrate that our model outperforms baseline methods in generalization, achieving superior classification performance for partially labeled multimodal data with imbalanced class distributions.

We consider the problem of two-sample testing in a semi-supervised setting with abundant unlabeled covariate data. Standard two-sample tests neglect covariate information, which has the potential to significantly boost performance. However, incorporating covariates potentially breaks the exchangeability assumption under the null, which further complicates a calibration procedure. To address these issues, we propose a semi-supervised method that produces a test statistic with asymptotic normality, while effectively integrating additional information from covariates. Our test is straightforward to calibrate due to the asymptotic normality under the null and achieves asymptotic power that is often much higher than existing kernel tests without covariates. Furthermore, we formally show that the proposed method is consistent in power against fixed and local alternatives. Simulations confirm the practical and theoretical strengths of our approach.

Learning binary classifiers from positive and unlabeled data (PUL) is vital in many real-world applications, especially when verifying negative examples is difficult. Despite the impressive empirical performance of recent PUL methods, challenges like accumulated errors and increased estimation bias persist due to the absence of negative labels. In this paper, we unveil an intriguing yet long-overlooked observation in PUL: resampling the positive data in each training iteration to ensure a balanced distribution between positive and unlabeled examples results in strong early-stage performance. Furthermore, predictive trends for positive and negative classes display distinctly different patterns. Specifically, the scores (output probability) of unlabeled negative examples consistently decrease, while those of unlabeled positive examples show largely chaotic trends. Instead of focusing on classification within individual time frames, we innovatively adopt a holistic approach, interpreting the scores of each example as a temporal point process (TPP).

Semi-supervised classification, where unlabeled data are massive but labeled data are limited, often arises in machine learning applications. We address this challenge under high-dimensional data by leveraging the manifold and cluster assumptions. Based on the Fermat distance, a density-sensitive metric that naturally encodes the cluster assumption, we propose the weighted $k$-nearest neighbors (NN) classifier and multidimensional scaling (MDS)-induced classifiers. The use of MDS with a large target dimension allows the effective application of linear classifiers to complex manifold data. Theoretically, we derive a sharp lower bound for the expected excess risk within clusters and prove that the weighted $k$-NN classifier utilizing the true Fermat distance is minimax optimal. Furthermore, we explicitly quantify the utility of unlabeled data by showing that the error arising from estimating the Fermat distance decays exponentially with the pooled sample size. Such a rate is much faster than the related rates in the literature. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate competitive or superior performance of our approaches compared to state-of-the-art graph-based semi-supervised classifiers.

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a popular approach to imbalanced binary classification problems. Existing AUC maximization methods usually assume that training and test distributions are identical. However, this assumption is often violated in practice due to {\it a positive distribution shift}, where the negative-conditional density does not change but the positive-conditional density can vary. This shift often occurs in imbalanced classification since positive data are often more diverse and time-varying than negative data. To deal with this shift, we theoretically show that the AUC on the test distribution can be expressed by using the positive and marginal training densities and the marginal test density. Based on this result, we can maximize the AUC on the test distribution by using positive and unlabeled data in the training distribution and unlabeled data in the test distribution. The proposed method requires only positive labels in the training distribution as supervision. Moreover, the derived AUC has a simple form and thus is easy to implement. The effectiveness of the proposed method is shown with four real-world datasets.

For all authors... (a) Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's contributions and scope? While this could potentially guide practitioners to improve classification and mixture proportion estimation in applications where negative unlabeled data is not available but unlabeled data is abundant, we do not believe that it will fundamentally impact how machine learning is used in a way that could conceivably be socially salient. If you used crowdsourcing or conducted research with human subjects... (a) Did you include the full text of instructions given to participants and screenshots, if applicable? [N/A] (b) Did you describe any potential participant risks, with links to Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals, if applicable? [N/A] (c) Did you include the estimated hourly wage paid to participants and the total amount spent on participant compensation? The proof primarily involves using DKW inequality [15] on pqupcqand pqppcqto show convergence to their respective means qupcqand qppcq. The main idea of the proof is to use the confidence bound derived in Lemma 1 at pcand use the fact that pcminimizes the upper confidence bound. The proof is split into two parts.