State-of-the-art model counters are based on exhaustive DPLL algorithms, and have been successfully used in probabilistic reasoning, one of the key problems in AI. In this article, we present a new exhaustive DPLL algorithm with a formal semantics, a proof of correctness, and a modular design. The modular design is based on the separation of the core model counting algorithm from SAT solving techniques. We also show that the trace of our algorithm belongs to the language of Sentential Decision Diagrams (SDDs), which is a subset of Decision-DNNFs, the trace of existing state-of-the-art model counters. Still, our experimental analysis shows comparable results against state-of-the-art model counters. Furthermore, we obtain the first top-down SDD compiler, and show orders-of-magnitude improvements in SDD construction time against the existing bottom-up SDD compiler.

The sentential decision diagram (SDD) has been recently proposed as a new  tractable representation of Boolean functions that generalizes the influential  ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD).  Empirically, compiling CNFs into SDDs  has yielded significant improvements in both time and space over compiling  them into OBDDs, using a bottom-up compilation approach. In this work, we present a top-down CNF to SDD compiler that is based on techniques  from the SAT literature. We compare the presented compiler empirically to the state-of-the-art, bottom-up SDD compiler, showing orders-of-magnitude improvements in compilation time.

The problem of on-line planning in partially observable settings involves two problems: keeping track of beliefs about the environment and selecting actions for achieving goals. While the two problems are computationally intractable in the worst case, significant progress has been achieved in recent years through the use of suitable reductions. In particular, the state-of-the-art CLG planner is based on a translation that maps deterministic partially observable problems into fully observable non-deterministic ones. The translation, which is quadratic in the number of problem fluents and gets rid of the belief tracking problem, is adequate for most benchmarks, and it is in fact complete for problems that have width 1. The more recent K-replanner uses translations that are linear, one for keeping track of beliefs and the other for selecting actions using off-the-shelf classical planners. As a result, the K-replanner scales up better but it is not as general. In this work, we combine the benefits of the two approaches - the scope of the CLG planner and the efficiency of the Kreplanner. The new planner, called LW1, is based on a translation that is linear but complete for width-1 problems. The scope and scalability of the new planner is evaluated experimentally by considering the existing benchmarks and new problems.

Recursive Conditioning (RC) was introduced recently as the first any-space algorithm for inference in Bayesian networks which can trade time for space by varying the size of its cache at the increment needed to store a floating point number. Under full caching, RC has an asymptotic time and space complexity which is comparable to mainstream algorithms based on variable elimination and clustering (exponential in the network treewidth and linear in its size). We show two main results about RC in this paper. First, we show that its actual space requirements under full caching are much more modest than those needed by mainstream methods and study the implications of this finding. Second, we show that RC can effectively deal with determinism in Bayesian networks by employing standard logical techniques, such as unit resolution, allowing a significant reduction in its time requirements in certain cases. We illustrate our results using a number of benchmark networks, including the very challenging ones that arise in genetic linkage analysis.

Some aspects of the result of applying unit resolution on a cnf formula can be formalized as functions with domain a set of partial truth assignments. We are interested in two ways for computing such functions, depending on whether the result is the production of the empty clause or the assignment of a variable with a given truth value. We show that these two models can compute the same functions with formulae of polynomially related sizes, and we explain how this result is related to the cnf encoding of Boolean constraints.

We study the relationship between optimal planning algorithms, in the form of (iterative deepening) A* with (forward) state-space search, and the reduction of the problem to SAT. Our results establish a strict dominance relation between the two approaches: any iterative deepening A* search can be efficiently simulated in the SAT framework, assuming that the heuristic has been encoded in the SAT problem, but the opposite is not possible as A* and IDA* searches sometimes take exponentially longer.

Unit resolution is a key feature of state of the art sat solvers [13] [7] [5], where it speeds up the search for solutions and inconsistencies. It is well known that different cnf representations of a given problem do not always allow unit resolution to deduce the same information. For example, the cnf encoding for pseudo Boolean constraints proposed in [3] allows unit resolution to restore generalized arc consistency. This is not the case with the encoding proposed in [16], which does not allow unit resolution to deduce as much information as the former encoding does. As a manner of speaking, the expressive power of unit resolution is best exploited using the encoding proposed in [3], with notable consequences on the resolution time.

We describe a variant of resolution rule of proof and show that it is complete for stable semantics of logic programs. We show applications of this result.