Goto

Collaborating Authors

 transformer fault diagnosis


Feature-Weighted MMD-CORAL for Domain Adaptation in Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Ensuring the reliable operation of power transformers is critical to grid stability. Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) is widely used for fault diagnosis, but traditional methods rely on heuristic rules, which may lead to inconsistent results. Machine learning (ML)-based approaches have improved diagnostic accuracy; however, power transformers operate under varying conditions, and differences in transformer type, environmental factors, and operational settings create distribution shifts in diagnostic data. Consequently, direct model transfer between transformers often fails, making techniques for domain adaptation a necessity. To tackle this issue, this work proposes a feature-weighted domain adaptation technique that combines Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and Correlation Alignment (CORAL) with feature-specific weighting (MCW). Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) statistics are used to assign adaptable weights, prioritizing features with larger distributional discrepancies and thereby improving source and target domain alignment. Experimental evaluations on datasets for power transformers demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, which achieves a 7.9% improvement over Fine-Tuning and a 2.2% improvement over MMD-CORAL (MC). Furthermore, it outperforms both techniques across various training sample sizes, confirming its robustness for domain adaptation.


Benchmarking Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Fault Detection in Power Transformers

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Accurate diagnosis of power transformer faults is essential for ensuring the stability and safety of electrical power systems. This study presents a comparative analysis of conventional machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) algorithms for fault classification of power transformers. Using a condition-monitored dataset spanning 10 months, various gas concentration features were normalized and used to train five ML classifiers: Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In addition, four DL models were evaluated: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN), and TabNet. Experimental results show that both ML and DL approaches performed comparably. The RF model achieved the highest ML accuracy at 86.82%, while the 1D-CNN model attained a close 86.30%.


The State of the Art in transformer fault diagnosis with artificial intelligence and Dissolved Gas Analysis: A Review of the Literature

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Transformer fault diagnosis (TFD) is a critical aspect of power system maintenance and management. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art in TFD using artificial intelligence (AI) and dissolved gas analysis (DGA). The paper presents an analysis of recent advancements in this field, including the use of deep learning algorithms and advanced data analytics techniques, and their potential impact on TFD and the power industry as a whole. The review also highlights the benefits and limitations of different approaches to transformer fault diagnosis, including rule-based systems, expert systems, neural networks, and machine learning algorithms. Overall, this review aims to provide valuable insights into the importance of TFD and the role of AI in ensuring the reliable operation of power systems.


Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis with Intrinsic Time-scale Decomposition and XGBoost Classifier

arXiv.org Machine Learning

An intrinsic time-scale decomposition (ITD) based method for power transformer fault diagnosis is proposed. Dissolved gas analysis (DGA) parameters are ranked according to their skewness, and then ITD based features extraction is performed. An optimal set of PRC features are determined by an XGBoost classifier. For classification purpose, an XGBoost classifier is used to the optimal PRC features set. The proposed method's performance in classification is studied using publicly available DGA data of 376 power transformers and employing an XGBoost classifier. The Proposed method achieves more than 95% accuracy and high sensitivity and F1-score, better than conventional methods and some recent machine learning-based fault diagnosis approaches. Moreover, it gives better Cohen Kappa and F1-score as compared to the recently introduced EMD-based hierarchical technique for fault diagnosis in power transformers.


Improved genetic algorithm and XGBoost classifier for power transformer fault diagnosis

#artificialintelligence

Power transformer is an essential component for the stable and reliable operation of electrical power grid. The traditional diagnostic methods based on dissolved gas analysis (DGA) have been used to identify the power transformer faults. However, the application of these methods is limited due to the low accuracy of fault identification. In this paper, a transformer fault diagnosis system is developed based on the combination of an improved genetic algorithm (IGA) and the XGBoost. In the transformer fault diagnosis system, the improved genetic algorithm is employed to pre-select the input features from the DGA data and optimize the XGBoost classifier. Performance measures such as average unfitness value, likelihood of evolution leap, and likelihood of optimality are used to validate the efficacy of the proposed improved genetic algorithm. The results of simulation experiments show that the improved genetic algorithm can get the optimal solution stably and reliably, and the proposed method improves the average accuracy of transformer fault diagnosis to 99.2\%. Compared to IEC ratios, dual triangle, support vector machine (SVM), and common vector approach (CVA), the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method is improved by 30.2\%, 47.2\%, 11.2\%, and 3.6\%, respectively. The proposed method can be a potential solution to identify the transformer fault types.