trading agent competition
The 2002 Trading Agent Competition
This article summarizes 16 agent strategies that were designed for the 2002 Trading Agent Competition. Agent architects use numerous general-purpose AI techniques, including machine learning, planning, partially observable Markov decision processes, Monte Carlo simulations, and multiagent systems. Ultimately, the most successful agents were primarily heuristic based and domain specific. It would be quite a daunting task to manually monitor prices and make bidding decisions at all web sites currently offering the camera--especially if accessories such as a flash and a tripod are sometimes bundled with the camera and sometimes auctioned separately. However, for the next generation of trading agents, autonomous bidding in simultaneous auctions will be a routine task.
The AAAI-13 Conference Workshops
Agrawal, Vikas (IBM Research-India) | Archibald, Christopher (Mississippi State University) | Bhatt, Mehul (University of Bremen) | Bui, Hung (Nuance) | Cook, Diane J. (Washington State University) | Cortés, Juan (University of Toulouse) | Geib, Christopher (Drexel University) | Gogate, Vibhav (University of Texas at Dallas) | Guesgen, Hans W. (Massey University) | Jannach, Dietmar (TU Dortmund) | Johanson, Michael (University of Alberta) | Kersting, Kristian (University of Bonn) | Konidaris, George (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Kotthoff, Lars (University College Cork) | Michalowski, Martin (Adventium Labs) | Natarajan, Sriraam (Indiana University) | O' (University College Cork) | Sullivan, Barry (Naval Research Laboratory) | Pickett, Marc (University of Zagreb) | Podobnik, Vedran (University of British Columbia) | Poole, David (GM Research, India) | Shastri, Lokendra (George Mason University) | Shehu, Amarda (University of Central Florida) | Sukthankar, Gita
Benjamin Grosof (Coherent Knowledge from episodic memory to great progress is being made on methods Systems) on representing activity create semantic memory, using a combination to solve problems related to structure context through semantic rule methods, of semantic memory and prediction, motion simulation, deriving from experience in the episodic memory to guide users?
Competitive Benchmarking: Lessons Learned from the Trading Agent Competition
Ketter, Wolfgang (Erasmus University) | Symeonidis, Andreas (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
In many real-life domains, such as trading environments, selfinterested entities need to operate subject to limited time and information. Additionally, the web has mediated an ever broader range of transactions, urging participants to concurrently trade across multiple markets. All these have generated the need for technologies that empower prompt investigation of large volumes of data and rapid evaluation of numerous alternative strategies in the face of constantly changing market conditions (Bichler, Gupta, and Ketter 2010). AI and machine-learning techniques, including neural networks and genetic algorithms, are continuously gaining ground in the support of such trading scenarios. User modeling, price forecasting, market equilibrium prediction, and strategy optimization are typical cases where AI typically provides reliable solutions. Yet, the adoption and deployment of AI practices in real trading environments remains limited, since the proprietary nature of markets precludes open benchmarking, which is critical for further scientific progress.
Pushing the Limits of Rational Agents: The Trading Agent Competition for Supply Chain Management
Collins, John (University of Minnesota) | Ketter, Wolfgang (Erasmus University) | Sadeh, Norman (Carnegie Mellon University)
Over the years, competitions have been important catalysts for progress in Artificial Intelligence. We describe one such competition, the Trading Agent Competition for Supply Chain Management (TAC SCM). We discuss its significance in the context of today’s global market economy as well as AI research, the ways in which it breaks away from limiting assumptions made in prior work, and some of the advances it has engendered over the past six years. TAC SCM requires autonomous supply chain entities, modeled as agents, to coordinate their internal operations while concurrently trading in multiple dynamic and highly competitive markets. Since its introduction in 2003, the competition has attracted over 150 entries and brought together researchers from AI and beyond in the form of 75 competing teams from 25 different countries.
The 2002 Trading Agent Competition: An Overview of Agent Strategies
In TAC-00, agent designs were primarily centered around designing algorithms a tripod are sometimes bundled with the camera to solve an NPcomplete optimization and sometimes auctioned separately. However, by the second year, it for the next generation of trading agents, became common knowledge that this problem autonomous bidding in simultaneous auctions was tractable for the TAC travel game parameters. During the second year, agent designs focused Simultaneous auctions, which characterize on estimating clearing prices, and some internet sites such as eBay.com, Agent design in and substitutable goods are on offer. Complementary TAC-02, however, cannot be described so succinctly.
The AAAI-02 and IAAI-02 Conferences
The Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-02) and the Fourteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of AI (IAAI- 02) were positively received by those who attended. This report provides a few snapshots of the vast and varied content of the 2002 conferences. Proceedings of AAAI-02 and IAAI-02 are available from AAAI Press (www.- aaaipress.org).