track pair
Development of a Vertex Finding Algorithm using Recurrent Neural Network
Goto, Kiichi, Suehara, Taikan, Yoshioka, Tamaki, Kurata, Masakazu, Nagahara, Hajime, Nakashima, Yuta, Takemura, Noriko, Iwasaki, Masako
Deep learning is a rapidly-evolving technology with possibility to significantly improve physics reach of collider experiments. In this study we developed a novel algorithm of vertex finding for future lepton colliders such as the International Linear Collider. We deploy two networks; one is simple fully-connected layers to look for vertex seeds from track pairs, and the other is a customized Recurrent Neural Network with an attention mechanism and an encoder-decoder structure to associate tracks to the vertex seeds. The performance of the vertex finder is compared with the standard ILC reconstruction algorithm.
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Asia > Japan > Kyūshū & Okinawa > Kyūshū (0.05)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kansai > Osaka Prefecture > Osaka (0.05)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
Establishing phone-pair co-usage by comparing mobility patterns
Bosma, Wauter, Dalm, Sander, van Eijk, Erwin, Harchaoui, Rachid el, Rijgersberg, Edwin, Tops, Hannah Tereza, Veenstra, Alle, Ypma, Rolf
In forensic investigations it is often of value to establish whether two phones were used by the same person during a given time period. We present a method that uses time and location of cell tower registrations of mobile phones to assess the strength of evidence that any pair of phones were used by the same person. The method is transparent as it uses logistic regression to discriminate between the hypotheses of same and different user, and a standard kernel density estimation to quantify the weight of evidence in terms of a likelihood ratio. We further add to previous theoretical work by training and validating our method on real world data, paving the way for application in practice. The method shows good performance under different modeling choices and robustness under lower quantity or quality of data. We discuss practical usage in court.
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.14)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Leiden (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.49)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.35)
- Telecommunications (1.00)
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Law > Criminal Law (0.93)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety > Crime Prevention & Enforcement (0.93)