Hallucination in large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge for their safe deployment, particularly due to its potential to spread misinformation. Most existing solutions address this challenge by focusing on aligning the models with credible sources or by improving how models communicate their confidence (or lack thereof) in their outputs. While these measures may be effective in most contexts, they may fall short in scenarios requiring more nuanced approaches, especially in situations where access to accurate data is limited or determining credible sources is challenging. In this study, we take North Korea - a country characterised by an extreme lack of reliable sources and the prevalence of sensationalist falsehoods - as a case study. We explore and evaluate how some of the best-performing multilingual LLMs and specific language-based models generate information about North Korea in three languages spoken in countries with significant geo-political interests: English (United States, United Kingdom), Korean (South Korea), and Mandarin Chinese (China). Our findings reveal significant differences, suggesting that the choice of model and language can lead to vastly different understandings of North Korea, which has important implications given the global security challenges the country poses.

Organizing interesting webpages into hot topics is one of key steps to understand the trends of multimodal web data. A state-of-the-art solution is firstly to organize webpages into a large volume of multi-granularity topic candidates; hot topics are further identified by estimating their interestingness. However, these topic candidates contain a large number of fragments of hot topics due to both the inefficient feature representations and the unsupervised topic generation. This paper proposes a bundling-refining approach to mine more complete hot topics from fragments. Concretely, the bundling step organizes the fragment topics into coarse topics; next, the refining step proposes a submodular-based method to refine coarse topics in a scalable approach. The propose unconventional method is simple, yet powerful by leveraging submodular optimization, our approach outperforms the traditional ranking methods which involve the careful design and complex steps. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach surpasses the state-of-the-art method (i.e., latent Poisson deconvolution Pang et al. (2016)) 20% accuracy and 10% one on two public data sets, respectively.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring dialogues with more complex goals, such as negotiation, persuasion, and emotional support, which go beyond traditional service-focused dialogue systems. Apart from the requirement for much more sophisticated strategic reasoning and communication skills, a significant challenge of these tasks lies in the difficulty of objectively measuring the achievement of their goals in a quantifiable way, making it difficult for existing research to directly optimize the dialogue procedure towards them. In our work, we emphasize the multifaceted nature of complex dialogue goals and argue that it is more feasible to accomplish them by comprehensively considering and jointly promoting their different aspects. To this end, we propose a novel dialogue framework, Cooper, which coordinates multiple specialized agents, each dedicated to a specific dialogue goal aspect separately, to approach the complex objective. Through this divide-and-conquer manner, we make complex dialogue goals more approachable and elicit greater intelligence via the collaboration of individual agents. Experiments on persuasion and emotional support dialogues demonstrate the superiority of our method over a set of competitive baselines.