CoSOD is novel and brings very competitive performances.

As a variety of automated collision prevention systems gain presence within personal vehicles, rating and differentiating the automated safety performance of car models has become increasingly important for consumers, manufacturers, and insurers. In 2023, Swiss Re and partners initiated an eight-month long vehicle testing campaign conducted on a recognized UNECE type approval authority and Euro NCAP accredited proving ground in Germany. The campaign exposed twelve mass-produced vehicle models and one prototype vehicle fitted with collision prevention systems to a selection of safety-critical traffic scenarios representative of United States and European Union accident landscape. In this paper, we compare and evaluate the relative safety performance of these thirteen collision prevention systems (hardware and software stack) as demonstrated by this testing campaign. We first introduce a new scoring system which represents a test system's predicted impact on overall real-world collision frequency and reduction of collision impact energy, weighted based on the real-world relevance of the test scenario. Next, we introduce a novel metric that quantifies the realism of the protocol and confirm that our test protocol is a plausible representation of real-world driving. Finally, we find that the prototype system in its pre-release state outperforms the mass-produced (post-consumer-release) vehicles in the majority of the tested scenarios on the test track.

Despite the widespread testing protocols for COVID-19, there are still significant challenges in early detection of the disease, which is crucial for preventing its spread and optimizing patient outcomes. Owing to the limited testing capacity in resource-strapped settings and the limitations of the available traditional methods of testing, it has been established that a fast and efficient strategy is important to fully stop the virus. Machine learning models can analyze large datasets, incorporating patient-reported symptoms, clinical data, and medical imaging. Symptom-based detection methods have been developed to predict COVID-19, and they have shown promising results. In this paper, we provide an overview of the landscape of symptoms-only machine learning models for predicting COVID-19, including their performance and limitations. The review will also examine the performance of symptom-based models when compared to image-based models. Because different studies used varying datasets, methodologies, and performance metrics. Selecting the model that performs best relies on the context and objectives of the research. However, based on the results, we observed that ensemble classifier performed exceptionally well in predicting the occurrence of COVID-19 based on patient symptoms with the highest overall accuracy of 97.88%. Gradient Boosting Algorithm achieved an AUC (Area Under the Curve) of 0.90 and identified key features contributing to the decision-making process. Image-based models, as observed in the analyzed studies, have consistently demonstrated higher accuracy than symptom-based models, often reaching impressive levels ranging from 96.09% to as high as 99%.

This study investigates the feasibility of developing an Artificial General Recommender (AGR), facilitated by recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs). An AGR comprises both conversationality and universality to engage in natural dialogues and generate recommendations across various domains. We propose ten fundamental principles that an AGR should adhere to, each with its corresponding testing protocols. We proceed to assess whether ChatGPT, a sophisticated LLM, can comply with the proposed principles by engaging in recommendation-oriented dialogues with the model while observing its behavior. Our findings demonstrate the potential for ChatGPT to serve as an AGR, though several limitations and areas for improvement are identified.

We derive minimax testing errors in a distributed framework where the data is split over multiple machines and their communication to a central machine is limited to $b$ bits. We investigate both the $d$- and infinite-dimensional signal detection problem under Gaussian white noise. We also derive distributed testing algorithms reaching the theoretical lower bounds. Our results show that distributed testing is subject to fundamentally different phenomena that are not observed in distributed estimation. Among our findings, we show that testing protocols that have access to shared randomness can perform strictly better in some regimes than those that do not. Furthermore, we show that consistent nonparametric distributed testing is always possible, even with as little as $1$-bit of communication and the corresponding test outperforms the best local test using only the information available at a single local machine.