Deep neural networks have revolutionized numerous research fields and applications. Despite their widespread success, a fundamental limitation known as catastrophic forgetting remains, where models fail to retain their ability to perform previously learned tasks after being trained on new ones. This limitation is particularly acute in certain continual learning scenarios, where models must integrate the knowledge from new domains with their existing capabilities. Traditional approaches to mitigate this problem typically rely on memory replay mechanisms, storing either original data samples, prototypes, or activation patterns. Although effective, these methods often introduce significant computational overhead, raise privacy concerns, and require the use of dedicated architectures. In this work we present ReReLRP (Remembering and Recognizing with LRP), a novel solution that leverages Layerwise Relevance Propagation (LRP) to preserve information across tasks. Our contribution provides increased privacy of existing replay-free methods while additionally offering built-in explainability, flexibility of model architecture and deployment, and a new mechanism to increase memory storage efficiency. We validate our approach on a wide variety of datasets, demonstrating results comparable with a well-known replay-based method in selected scenarios.

Block-based visual programming environments play a critical role in introducing computing concepts to K-12 students. One of the key pedagogical challenges in these environments is in designing new practice tasks for a student that match a desired level of difficulty and exercise specific programming concepts. Our methodology is based on the realization that the mapping from the space of visual tasks to their solution codes is highly discontinuous; hence, directly mutating reference task \task {in} to generate new tasks is futile. Then, the algorithm performs symbolic execution over a code \code {out} to obtain a visual task \task {out}; this step uses the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) procedure to guide the search in the symbolic tree. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm through an extensive empirical evaluation and user study on reference tasks taken from the Hour of Code: Classic Maze challenge by Code.org and the Intro to Programming with Karel course by CodeHS.com.

In this paper, we investigate continual learning performance metrics used in class incremental learning strategies for continual learning (CL) using some high performing methods. We investigate especially mean task accuracy. First, we show that it lacks of expressiveness through some simple experiments to capture performance. We show that monitoring average tasks performance is over optimistic and can lead to misleading conclusions for future real life industrial uses. Then, we propose first a simple metric, Minimal Incremental Class Accuracy (MICA) which gives a fair and more useful evaluation of different continual learning methods. Moreover, in order to provide a simple way to easily compare different methods performance in continual learning, we derive another single scalar metric that take into account the learning performance variation as well as our newly introduced metric.

Spatial and spatiotemporal prediction tasks are common in applications ranging from environmental sciences to archaeology and epidemiology. While sophisticated mathematical frameworks have long been developed in spatial statistics to characterize predictive uncertainties under well-defined mathematical assumptions such as intrinsic stationarity (e.g., Cressie 1993), computational estimation procedures have only been proposed more recently to assess predictive performances of spatial and spatiotemporal prediction models (Brenning 2005, 2012; Pohjankukka, Pahikkala, Nevalainen, and Heikkonen 2017; Roberts, Bahn, Ciuti, Boyce, Elith, Guillera-Arroita, Hauenstein, Lahoz-Monfort, Schröder, Thuiller, Warton, Wintle, Hartig, and Dormann 2017). Although alternatives such as the bootstrap exist since some decades (Efron and Gong 1983; Hand 1997), cross-validation (CV) is a particularly well-established, easy-to-implement algorithm for model assessment of supervised machine-learning models (Efron and Gong 1983, and next section) and model selection (Arlot and Celisse 2010). In its basic form, CV is based on resampling the data without paying attention to any possible dependence structure, which may arise from, e.g., grouped or structured data, or underlying environmental processes inducing some sort of spatial coherence at the landscape scale. In treating dependent observations as independent, or ignoring autocorrelation, CV test samples may in fact be heavily correlated with, or even pseudo-replicates of, the data used for training the model, which introduces a potentially severe bias in assessing the transferability of flexible machine-learning (ML) models.