Goto

Collaborating Authors

 synthesized label


Unbiased Learning to Rank with Biased Continuous Feedback

Ren, Yi, Tang, Hongyan, Zhu, Siwen

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

It is a well-known challenge to learn an unbiased ranker with biased feedback. Unbiased learning-to-rank(LTR) algorithms, which are verified to model the relative relevance accurately based on noisy feedback, are appealing candidates and have already been applied in many applications with single categorical labels, such as user click signals. Nevertheless, the existing unbiased LTR methods cannot properly handle continuous feedback, which are essential for many industrial applications, such as content recommender systems. To provide personalized high-quality recommendation results, recommender systems need model both categorical and continuous biased feedback, such as click and dwell time. Accordingly, we design a novel unbiased LTR algorithm to tackle the challenges, which innovatively models position bias in the pairwise fashion and introduces the pairwise trust bias to separate the position bias, trust bias, and user relevance explicitly and can work for both continuous and categorical feedback. Experiment results on public benchmark datasets and internal live traffic of a large-scale recommender system at Tencent News show superior results for continuous labels and also competitive performance for categorical labels of the proposed method.


Unbiased Pairwise Learning to Rank in Recommender Systems

Ren, Yi, Tang, Hongyan, Zhu, Siwen

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Nowadays, recommender systems already impact almost every facet of peoples lives. To provide personalized high quality recommendation results, conventional systems usually train pointwise rankers to predict the absolute value of objectives and leverage a distinct shallow tower to estimate and alleviate the impact of position bias. However, with such a training paradigm, the optimization target differs a lot from the ranking metrics valuing the relative order of top ranked items rather than the prediction precision of each item. Moreover, as the existing system tends to recommend more relevant items at higher positions, it is difficult for the shallow tower based methods to precisely attribute the user feedback to the impact of position or relevance. Therefore, there exists an exciting opportunity for us to get enhanced performance if we manage to solve the aforementioned issues. Unbiased learning to rank algorithms, which are verified to model the relative relevance accurately based on noisy feedback, are appealing candidates and have already been applied in many applications with single categorical labels, such as user click signals. Nevertheless, the existing unbiased LTR methods cannot properly handle multiple feedback incorporating both categorical and continuous labels. Accordingly, we design a novel unbiased LTR algorithm to tackle the challenges, which innovatively models position bias in the pairwise fashion and introduces the pairwise trust bias to separate the position bias, trust bias, and user relevance explicitly. Experiment results on public benchmark datasets and internal live traffic show the superior results of the proposed method for both categorical and continuous labels.


Iterative Teaching by Label Synthesis

Liu, Weiyang, Liu, Zhen, Wang, Hanchen, Paull, Liam, Schölkopf, Bernhard, Weller, Adrian

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

In this paper, we consider the problem of iterative machine teaching, where a teacher provides examples sequentially based on the current iterative learner. In contrast to previous methods that have to scan over the entire pool and select teaching examples from it in each iteration, we propose a label synthesis teaching framework where the teacher randomly selects input teaching examples (e.g., images) and then synthesizes suitable outputs (e.g., labels) for them. We show that this framework can avoid costly example selection while still provably achieving exponential teachability. We propose multiple novel teaching algorithms in this framework. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the value of our framework.