MILE HIGH CHAOS - Gunfire erupts during Denver Nuggets NBA Finals victory celebration, 9 injured. Continue reading … GO TO THE TAPE - FBI document bombshell – Burisma executive kept secret recordings of Joe, Hunter Biden, Grassley says. You could be doing more harm than good. 'CREDIBLE WHISTLEBLOWER' - Did Joe Biden sell out America? 4 things to know about Democrats' claims, writes Rep. James Comer. AI AND ADVERSARIES - House demands Pentagon update on new tech as threats from China pile up.

British YouTuber Tom Scott has such a distinctive style to his videos that they can -- and have -- lent themselves quite well to parody in the past, both from humans and AIs alike. But for his latest video, Scott decided to use this to his advantage. After getting access to OpenAI's GPT-3 text generator, Scott fed it a large number of his previous video titles to see if it could come up with some new and original story ideas for him. And after a few false starts with titles that were either too boring or nonsensical, it ended up nailing it. "GPT-3 has a setting called Temperature, which is basically how predictable it should be," explains Scott in the video above.

In a landmark study, 20 top US corporate lawyers with decades of experience in corporate law and contract review were pitted against an AI. Their task was to spot issues in five Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), which are a contractual basis for most business deals. The study, carried out with leading legal academics and experts, saw the LawGeex AI achieve an average 94% accuracy rate, higher than the lawyers who achieved an average rate of 85%. It took the lawyers an average of 92 minutes to complete the NDA issue spotting, compared to 26 seconds for the LawGeex AI. The longest time taken by a lawyer to complete the test was 156 minutes, and the shortest time was 51 minutes.