supplementary material
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Basque Country > Biscay Province > Bilbao (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Government > Tax (1.00)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining (0.94)
- Information Technology > e-Commerce > Financial Technology (0.93)
- Information Technology > Communications (0.93)
CRoSS: Diffusion Model Makes Controllable, Robust and Secure Image Steganography (Supplementary Material)
Below, we will introduce the details of each stage separately. In practical applications of image steganography, it is common to hide a single subject in an image, and this is also a problem that our method excels at solving. We employed two methods to obtain "Prompt1" and "Prompt2": an ChatGPT to generate the modified "Prompt2". The specific process of generating "Prompt2" is shown in Fig. A.1. We present examples from the Stego260 dataset in Fig. A.2, where each example consists of an image We show images from three categories: humans, animals, and general objects.
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Health Care Technology (0.91)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology > Alzheimer's Disease (0.31)
Supplementary Materials for: Max-Sliced Mutual Information A Proofs
A.1 Proof of Proposition 1 We note that 1 is restated and was proved in [25, Appendix A.1] Proof of 2: Non-negativity directly follows by non-negativity of mutual information. Proof of 5: The proof relies on the independence of functions of independent random variables. This concludes the proof. 1 A.2 Proof of Proposition 2 By translation invariance of mutual information, we may assume w.l.o.g. that the means are Next, we show that we may equivalently optimize with the added unit variance constraint. Example 3.4]), we have I (A B) null, where the last equality uses the unit variance property and Schur's determinant formula. Armed with Lemma 1, we are in place to prove Proposition 2. Since the CCA solutions Theorem 2.2], which is restated next for completeness.
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel > Tel Aviv District > Tel Aviv (0.04)
- Africa > Namibia (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.49)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.05)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Asia > China > Guangxi Province > Nanning (0.04)
- Energy (0.47)
- Health & Medicine (0.46)
Multi-body SE(3) Equivariance for Unsupervised Rigid Segmentation and Motion Estimation (Supplementary Material)
Differently, our unsupervised multi-body task requires the model's ability to handle part-level local equivariance, Figure 1: Structure of our feature extractor based on EPN. "EPNConv" is the SE(3)-equivariant convolution proposed in the vanilla EPN network. Part-level SE(3)-equivariance is desirable for motion analysis, especially rotation estimation. Song and Y ang utilized the methodology proposed by Choy et al . All other objects were considered part of the background.
- North America > United States > Maryland > Baltimore (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- (16 more...)