stochastic gradient descent
Country:
- North America > United States > Arizona > Maricopa County > Phoenix (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Asia > China > Jiangsu Province > Nanjing (0.04)
- (13 more...)
Technology: Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.04)
- Asia > China > Guangxi Province > Nanning (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.04)
- Asia > China > Guangxi Province > Nanning (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- Asia > Middle East > Israel > Tel Aviv District > Tel Aviv (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
Technology: Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Gradient Descent (0.68)
Country:
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > China > Jiangsu Province > Nanjing (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Alberta (0.14)
- Europe > Spain > Andalusia > Cádiz Province > Cadiz (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Kanagawa Prefecture (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (3 more...)
Technology:
A Detailed comparisons with related work
In Table 1, we compare our agnostic learning results. Our results in this setting come from Theorem 3.3. We note that the sample complexity for Diakonikolas et al. To prove Lemma 3.5, we use the following result of Y ehudai and Shamir [35]. We first consider the case when σ satisfies Assumption 3.1.