source code
Backlash builds over NHS plan to hide source code from AI hacking risk
NHS England is pulling its open-source software from the internet because of fears around computer-hacking AI models like Mythos. A decision by NHS England to withdraw open-source code created with UK taxpayer funds because of the risk posed by computer-hacking AI models is attracting growing backlash. Last month, Mythos, an AI created by technology firm Anthropic, was widely reported to be capable of discovering flaws in virtually any software, potentially allowing hackers to break into systems running it. NHS England has now told staff that existing and future software must be pulled from public view and kept behind closed doors by 11 May because of this risk. The decision goes against the NHS service standard, which requires that staff make any software they produce open-source so that tools can be built upon, improved and used without the need for duplicated effort.
NHS England rushes to hide software over AI hacking fears
NHS England is hurriedly withdrawing all the software it has written from public view because of the perceived risk of hacking from cutting-edge artificial intelligence. Security experts say the move is unnecessary and counterproductive. Software produced by the National Health Service has previously been made open-source and listed on GitHub because it is created with public money. This allows other organisations to build upon it and make better services more cheaply without duplicating effort. But NHS England has issued new guidance to staff, which has been shared with, that demands existing and future software be pulled from public view and kept behind closed doors.
Review Networks for Caption Generation
Zhilin Yang, Ye Yuan, Yuexin Wu, William W. Cohen, Russ R. Salakhutdinov
We propose a novel extension of the encoder-decoder framework, called a review network. The review network is generic and can enhance any existing encoderdecoder model: in this paper, we consider RNN decoders with both CNN and RNN encoders. The review network performs a number of review steps with attention mechanism on the encoder hidden states, and outputs a thought vector after each review step; the thought vectors are used as the input of the attention mechanism in the decoder. We show that conventional encoder-decoders are a special case of our framework.
Integrating Tree Path in Transformer for Code Representation
Learning distributed representation of source code requires modelling its syntax and semantics. Recent state-of-the-art models leverage highly structured source code representations, such as the syntax trees and paths therein. In this paper, we investigate two representative path encoding methods shown in previous research work and integrate them into the attention module of Transformer. We draw inspiration from the ideas of positional encoding and modify them to incorporate these path encoding.
0be50b4590f1c5fdf4c8feddd63c4f67-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf
In Figure 1 we demonstrate the common neighbor (CN) distribution among positive and negative test samples for ogbl-collab, ogbl-ppa, and ogbl-citation2. These results demonstrate that a vast majority of negative samples have no CNs. Since CNs is a typically good heuristic, this makes it easy to identify most negative samples. We further present the CN distribution of Cora, Citeseer, Pubmed, and ogbl-ddi in Figure 3. The CN distribution of Cora, Citeseer, and Pubmed are consistent with our previous observations on the OGB datasets in Figure 1.