A fundamental challenge in the empirical sciences involves uncovering causal structure through observation and experimentation. Causal discovery entails linking the conditional independence (CI) invariances in observational data to their corresponding graphical constraints via d-separation. In this paper, we consider a general setting where we have access to data from multiple experimental distributions resulting from hard interventions, as well as potentially from an observational distribution. By comparing different interventional distributions, we propose a set of graphical constraints that are fundamentally linked to Pearl's do-calculus within the framework of hard interventions. These graphical constraints associate each graphical structure with a set of interventional distributions that are consistent with the rules of do-calculus. We characterize the interventional equivalence class of causal graphs with latent variables and introduce a graphical representation that can be used to determine whether two causal graphs are interventionally equivalent, i.e., whether they are associated with the same family of hard interventional distributions, where the elements of the family are indistinguishable using the invariances from do-calculus. We also propose a learning algorithm to integrate multiple datasets from hard interventions, introducing new orientation rules. The learning objective is a tuple of augmented graphs which entails a set of causal graphs. We also prove the soundness of the proposed algorithm.

Causal representation learning (CRL) is the process of disentangling the latent low-dimensional causally-related generating factors underlying high-dimensional observable data. Extensive recent studies have characterized CRL identifiability and perfect recovery of the latent variables and their attendant causal graph. This paper introduces the notion of reward-oriented CRL, the purpose of which is to move away from perfectly learning the latent representation and instead learning it to the extent needed for optimizing a desired downstream task (reward). In reward-oriented CRL, perfectly learning the latent representation can be excessive; instead, it must be learned at the coarsest level sufficient for optimizing the desired task. Reward-oriented CRL is formalized as the optimization of a desired function of the observable data over the space of all possible interventions and focuses on linear causal and transformation models. To sequentially identify the optimal subset of interventions, an adaptive exploration algorithm is designed that learns the latent causal graph and the variables needed to identify the best intervention. It is shown that for an n-dimensional latent space and a d-dimensional observation space, over a horizon T the algorithm's regret scales as O(d

How to ensure fairness in algorithmic decision making models is an important task in machine learning [12,15]. Over the past years, many researchers have been devoted to the design of fair classification algorithms withrespecttoapre-defined protected attribute,suchasraceorsex,anda decision task/model, such as hiring [1,11,24]. In particular,one line of the work istoincorporate fairness constraints into classic learning algorithms tobuild fair classifiers from potentially biased data [4,13,29,31-33]. Most of previous research generally focuses on a single decision model.

Causal disentanglement aims to uncover a representation of data using latent variables that are interrelated through a causal model. Such a representation is identifiable if the latent model that explains the data is unique. In this paper, we focus on the scenario where unpaired observational and interventional data are available, with each intervention changing the mechanism of a latent variable. When the causal variables are fully observed, statistically consistent algorithms have been developed to identify the causal model under faithfulness assumptions. We here show that identifiability can still be achieved with unobserved causal variables, given a generalized notion of faithfulness. Our results guarantee that we can recover the latent causal model up to an equivalence class and predict the effect of unseen combinations of interventions, in the limit of infinite data. We implement our causal disentanglement framework by developing an autoencoding variational Bayes algorithm and apply it to the problem of predicting combinatorial perturbation effects in genomics.

The challenge of learning the causal structure underlying a certain phenomenon is undertaken by connecting the set of conditional independences (CIs) readable from the observational data, on the one side, with the set of corresponding constraints implied over the graphical structure, on the other, which are tied through a graphical criterion known as d-separation (Pearl, 1988). In this paper, we investigate the more general scenario where multiple observational and experimental distributions are available. We start with the simple observation that the invariances given by CIs/d-separation are just one special type of a broader set of constraints, which follow from the careful comparison of the different distributions available. Remarkably, these new constraints are intrinsically connected with do-calculus (Pearl, 1995) in the context of soft-interventions. We introduce a novel notion of interventional equivalence class of causal graphs with latent variables based on these invariances, which associates each graphical structure with a set of interventional distributions that respect the do-calculus rules. Given a collection of distributions, two causal graphs are called interventionally equivalent if they are associated with the same family of interventional distributions, where the elements of the family are indistinguishable using the invariances obtained from a direct application of the calculus rules. We introduce a graphical representation that can be used to determine if two causal graphs are interventionally equivalent. We provide a formal graphical characterization of this equivalence. Finally, we extend the FCI algorithm, which was originally designed to operate based on CIs, to combine observational and interventional datasets, including new orientation rules particular to this setting.