Response consistency-based, reference-free hallucination detection (RFHD) methods do not depend on internal model states, such as generation probabilities or gradients, which Grey-box models typically rely on but are inaccessible in closed-source LLMs. However, their inability to capture query-response alignment patterns often results in lower detection accuracy. Additionally, the lack of large-scale benchmark datasets spanning diverse domains remains a challenge, as most existing datasets are limited in size and scope. To this end, we propose HalluCounter, a novel reference-free hallucination detection method that utilizes both response-response and query-response consistency and alignment patterns. This enables the training of a classifier that detects hallucinations and provides a confidence score and an optimal response for user queries. Furthermore, we introduce HalluCounterEval, a benchmark dataset comprising both synthetically generated and human-curated samples across multiple domains. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches by a significant margin, achieving over 90\% average confidence in hallucination detection across datasets.

Constructing high-quality Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) datasets is critical for the training of large language models (LLMs). Recent studies have shown that using data from a specific source, Ruozhiba, a Chinese website where users ask "silly" questions to better understand certain topics, can lead to better fine-tuning performance. This paper aims to explore some hidden factors: the potential interpretations of its success and a large-scale evaluation of the performance. First, we leverage GPT-4 to analyze the successful cases of Ruozhiba questions from the perspective of education, psychology, and cognitive science, deriving a set of explanatory rules. Then, we construct fine-tuning datasets by applying these rules to the MMLU training set. Surprisingly, our results indicate that rules can significantly improve model performance in certain tasks, while potentially diminishing performance on others. For example, SFT data generated following the "Counterintuitive Thinking" rule can achieve approximately a 5% improvement on the "Global Facts" task, whereas the "Blurring the Conceptual Boundaries" rule leads to a performance drop of 6.14% on the "Econometrics" task. In addition, for specific tasks, different rules tend to have a consistent impact on model performance. This suggests that the differences between the extracted rules are not as significant, and the effectiveness of the rules is relatively consistent across tasks. Our research highlights the importance of considering task diversity and rule applicability when constructing SFT datasets to achieve more comprehensive performance improvements.

Existing large language models have to run K times to generate a sequence of K tokens. Our approach relies on the observation that adjacent tokens in a sequence usually have strong correlations and the next token in a sequence can be reasonably guessed or inferred based on the preceding ones. Experiments and analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in lowering inference latency, achieving up to 1.4x speedup while preserving high performance. Large language models (LLMs) (Brown et al., 2020; OpenAI, 2023; Touvron et al., 2023; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Biderman et al., 2023; Smith et al., 2022) have revolutionized the field of natural language generation for their abilities in generating satisfactory text across various application domains. The excellent performance benefits greatly from the scaling of model size (100B+ parameters), but at the same time, the fact remains that a single decoding step gets slower as the model gets larger. In addition to the immense computation introduced by larger models, a larger memory footprint is also a major factor causing slower inference of LLMs (Dao et al., 2022; Pope et al., 2023). This large memory footprint includes the trained model parameters, the temporary state used during inference, and in addition to these, the KV cache is also stored in memory.