Existing multi-label ranking (MLR) frameworks only exploit information deduced from the bipartition of labels into positive and negative sets. Therefore, they do not benefit from ranking among positive labels, which is the novel MLR approach we introduce in this paper. We propose UniMLR, a new MLR paradigm that models implicit class relevance/significance values as probability distributions using the ranking among positive labels, rather than treating them as equally important. This approach unifies ranking and classification tasks associated with MLR. Additionally, we address the challenges of scarcity and annotation bias in MLR datasets by introducing eight synthetic datasets (Ranked MNISTs) generated with varying significance-determining factors, providing an enriched and controllable experimental environment. We statistically demonstrate that our method accurately learns a representation of the positive rank order, which is consistent with the ground truth and proportional to the underlying significance values. Finally, we conduct comprehensive empirical experiments on both real-world and synthetic datasets, demonstrating the value of our proposed framework. Code is available at https://github.com/MrGranddy/UniMLR.

Existing multi-label frameworks only exploit the information deduced from the bipartition of the labels into a positive and negative set. Therefore, they do not benefit from the ranking order between positive labels, which is the concept we introduce in this paper. We propose a novel multi-label ranking method: GaussianMLR, which aims to learn implicit class significance values that determine the positive label ranks instead of treating them as of equal importance, by following an approach that unifies ranking and classification tasks associated with multi-label ranking. Due to the scarcity of public datasets, we introduce eight synthetic datasets generated under varying importance factors to provide an enriched and controllable experimental environment for this study. On both real-world and synthetic datasets, we carry out extensive comparisons with relevant baselines and evaluate the performance on both of the two sub-tasks. We show that our method is able to accurately learn a representation of the incorporated positive rank order, which is not only consistent with the ground truth but also proportional to the underlying information. We strengthen our claims empirically by conducting comprehensive experimental studies.

In statistics, hypothesis testing is a form of inference using data to draw certain conclusions about the population. First, we make an assumption about the population which is known as the Null Hypothesis. It is denoted by H₀. Then we define the Alternate Hypothesis which is the opposite of what is stated in the Null Hypothesis, denoted by Hₐ. After defining both the Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis we perform what is known as a hypothesis test to either accept or reject the Null Hypothesis.