section 2
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.06)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > United States > Oregon > Washington County > Hillsboro (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Claremont (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.05)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.05)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.05)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Kanagawa Prefecture (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- Information Technology > Mathematics of Computing (0.68)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.46)
Provable Benefits of Complex Parameterizations for Structured State Space Models
Structured state space models (SSMs), the core engine behind prominent neural networks such as S4 and Mamba, are linear dynamical systems adhering to a specified structure, most notably diagonal. In contrast to typical neural network modules, whose parameterizations are real, SSMs often use complex parameter-izations. Theoretically explaining the benefits of complex parameterizations for SSMs is an open problem. The current paper takes a step towards its resolution, by establishing formal gaps between real and complex diagonal SSMs.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel > Tel Aviv District > Tel Aviv (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Workflow (0.67)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Delft (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (0.46)
- Government > Military (0.46)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- Europe > Denmark > Capital Region > Copenhagen (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.04)
Datasheet Y ubo Ma
Q1: F or what purpose was the dataset created? As stated in Section 1, most previous datasets on DU focus on single-page DU. Our benchmark is constructed to bridge such a gap. Q2: Who created the dataset (e.g., which team, research group) and on behalf of which entity (e.g., Q3: What support was needed to make this dataset? Q1: What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent (e.g., documents, photos, people, countries)?
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.06)
- Asia > Singapore (0.06)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.05)
- (3 more...)