section 1
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Europe > Italy (0.04)
- Asia > South Korea > Seoul > Seoul (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Santa Clara (0.05)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts (0.04)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
2cfa8f9e50e0f510ede9d12338a5f564-AuthorFeedback.pdf
We thank the reviewers for their feedback. Our'formulation is generic and task-agnostic and therefore has the potential'The model simplifies existing work' ( R1) and'has been applied to many loss functions and tasks without any change'The experiments cover different tasks and benchmark datasets' ( R3). 'It is misleading to claim that the paper is the first work using task-agnostic weights that do not require iterative W e do not make such a claim . We believe a simple and easy-to-use idea has potential for great impact. We review (in Section 2.1 and Section 1 from the supplementary) We therefore propose in Section 2.2 the Section 2.3); (2) handle both positive-and negative-valued losses (which justifies the squared regularizer log term'Does not brings notably new criteria in determining the sample weights' (R3.3). 'SuperLoss does not show an advantage on clean data' (R3.4).