In this paper, we investigate the necessity of traceability for accurate learning in stochastic convex optimization (SCO) under ℓp geometries. Informally, we say a learning algorithm is m-traceable if, by analyzing its output, it is possible to identify at least m of its training samples. Our main results uncover a fundamental tradeoff between traceability and excess risk in SCO. For every p [1,), we establish the existence of an excess risk threshold below which every sample-efficient learner is traceable with the number of samples which is a constant fraction of its training sample. For p [1, 2], this threshold coincides with the best excess risk of differentially private (DP) algorithms, i.e., above this threshold, there exist algorithms that are not traceable, which corresponds to a sharp phase transition. For p (2,), this threshold instead gives novel lower bounds for DP learning, partially closing an open problem in this setup. En route to establishing these results, we prove a sparse variant of the fingerprinting lemma, which is of independent interest to the community.

The stochastic compositional optimization (SCO) is popular in many real-world applications, including risk management, reinforcement learning, and meta-learning. However, most of the previous methods for SCO require the smoothness assumption on both the outer and inner functions, which limits their applications to a wider range of problems. In this paper, we study the SCO problem in that both the outer and inner functions are Lipschitz continuous but possibly nonconvex and nonsmooth. In particular, we propose gradient-free stochastic methods for finding the $(\delta, \epsilon)$-Goldstein stationary points of such problems with non-asymptotic convergence rates. Our results also lead to an improved convergence rate for the convex nonsmooth SCO problem. Furthermore, we conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Most of the existing work [2, 5, 6, 7, 8] for nonconvex SCO problem is based on the assumption that both functionsf()andg()are smooth.

Multi-epoch, small-batch, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has been the method of choice for learning with large over-parameterized models. A popular theory for explaining why SGD works well in practice is that the algorithm has an implicit regularization that biases its output towards a good solution. Perhaps the theoretically most well understood learning setting for SGD is that of Stochastic Convex Optimization (SCO), where it is well known that SGD learns at a rate of $O(1/\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of samples. In this paper, we consider the problem of SCO and explore the role of implicit regularization, batch size and multiple epochs for SGD. Our main contributions are threefold: * We show that for any regularizer, there is an SCO problem for which Regularized Empirical Risk Minimzation fails to learn.

Our main contributions are threefold: 1. We show that for any regularizer, there is an SCO problem for which Regularized Empirical Risk Minimzation fails to learn.

The stochastic compositional optimization (SCO) is popular in many real-world applications, including risk management, reinforcement learning, and meta-learning. However, most of the previous methods for SCO require the smoothness assumption on both the outer and inner functions, which limits their applications to a wider range of problems. In this paper, we study the SCO problem in that both the outer and inner functions are Lipschitz continuous but possibly nonconvex and nonsmooth. In particular, we propose gradient-free stochastic methods for finding the (\delta, \epsilon) -Goldstein stationary points of such problems with non-asymptotic convergence rates. Our results also lead to an improved convergence rate for the convex nonsmooth SCO problem. Furthermore, we conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Multi-epoch, small-batch, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has been the method of choice for learning with large over-parameterized models. A popular theory for explaining why SGD works well in practice is that the algorithm has an implicit regularization that biases its output towards a good solution. Perhaps the theoretically most well understood learning setting for SGD is that of Stochastic Convex Optimization (SCO), where it is well known that SGD learns at a rate of O(1/\sqrt{n}), where n is the number of samples. In this paper, we consider the problem of SCO and explore the role of implicit regularization, batch size and multiple epochs for SGD. Our main contributions are threefold: * We show that for any regularizer, there is an SCO problem for which Regularized Empirical Risk Minimzation fails to learn.

Simulating a single trajectory of a dynamical system under some state-dependent policy is a core bottleneck in policy optimization algorithms. The many inherently serial policy evaluations that must be performed in a single simulation constitute the bulk of this bottleneck. To wit, in applying policy optimization to supply chain optimization (SCO) problems, simulating a single month of a supply chain can take several hours. We present an iterative algorithm for policy simulation, which we dub Picard Iteration. This scheme carefully assigns policy evaluation tasks to independent processes. Within an iteration, a single process evaluates the policy only on its assigned tasks while assuming a certain 'cached' evaluation for other tasks; the cache is updated at the end of the iteration. Implemented on GPUs, this scheme admits batched evaluation of the policy on a single trajectory. We prove that the structure afforded by many SCO problems allows convergence in a small number of iterations, independent of the horizon. We demonstrate practical speedups of 400x on large-scale SCO problems even with a single GPU, and also demonstrate practical efficacy in other RL environments.