ImageNet++, no toxic images were found, indicating that the dataset's captions are safe.

ImageNet++, no toxic images were found, indicating that the dataset's captions are safe.

This tutorial intends to introduce readers with a background in AI to quantum machine learning (QML) -- a rapidly evolving field that seeks to leverage the power of quantum computers to reshape the landscape of machine learning. For self-consistency, this tutorial covers foundational principles, representative QML algorithms, their potential applications, and critical aspects such as trainability, generalization, and computational complexity. In addition, practical code demonstrations are provided in https://qml-tutorial.github.io/ to illustrate real-world implementations and facilitate hands-on learning. Together, these elements offer readers a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in QML. By bridging the gap between classical machine learning and quantum computing, this tutorial serves as a valuable resource for those looking to engage with QML and explore the forefront of AI in the quantum era.

In practice, we are often faced with small-sized tabular data. However, current tabular benchmarks are not geared towards data-scarce applications, making it very difficult to derive meaningful conclusions from empirical comparisons. We introduce PMLBmini, a tabular benchmark suite of 44 binary classification datasets with sample sizes $\leq$ 500. We use our suite to thoroughly evaluate current automated machine learning (AutoML) frameworks, off-the-shelf tabular deep neural networks, as well as classical linear models in the low-data regime. Our analysis reveals that state-of-the-art AutoML and deep learning approaches often fail to appreciably outperform even a simple logistic regression baseline, but we also identify scenarios where AutoML and deep learning methods are indeed reasonable to apply. Our benchmark suite, available on https://github.com/RicardoKnauer/TabMini , allows researchers and practitioners to analyze their own methods and challenge their data efficiency.

The development of a large language model (LLM) infrastructure is a pivotal undertaking in artificial intelligence. This paper explores the intricate landscape of LLM infrastructure, software, and data management. By analyzing these core components, we emphasize the pivotal considerations and safeguards crucial for successful LLM development. This work presents a concise synthesis of the challenges and strategies inherent in constructing a robust and effective LLM infrastructure, offering valuable insights for researchers and practitioners alike. In the endeavor of constructing a robust and expansive large language model (LLM) infrastructure [1], the pivotal challenges encountered inherently encompass the trifecta of infrastructure, software, and data.

Rapid progress in general-purpose AI has sparked significant interest in "red teaming," a practice of adversarial testing originating in military and cybersecurity applications. AI red teaming raises many questions about the human factor, such as how red teamers are selected, biases and blindspots in how tests are conducted, and harmful content's psychological effects on red teamers. A growing body of HCI and CSCW literature examines related practices-including data labeling, content moderation, and algorithmic auditing. However, few, if any, have investigated red teaming itself. This workshop seeks to consider the conceptual and empirical challenges associated with this practice, often rendered opaque by non-disclosure agreements. Future studies may explore topics ranging from fairness to mental health and other areas of potential harm. We aim to facilitate a community of researchers and practitioners who can begin to meet these challenges with creativity, innovation, and thoughtful reflection.

All types of research, development, and policy work can have unintended, adverse consequences - work in responsible artificial intelligence (RAI), ethical AI, or ethics in AI is no exception.

Despite the growing consensus that stakeholders affected by AI systems should participate in their design, enormous variation and implicit disagreements exist among current approaches. For researchers and practitioners who are interested in taking a participatory approach to AI design and development, it remains challenging to assess the extent to which any participatory approach grants substantive agency to stakeholders. This article thus aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation and through empirical investigation and critique of its current practices. Specifically, we derive a conceptual framework through synthesis of literature across technology design, political theory, and the social sciences that researchers and practitioners can leverage to evaluate approaches to participation in AI design. Additionally, we articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners. We use these empirical findings to understand the current state of participatory practice and subsequently provide guidance to better align participatory goals and methods in a way that accounts for practical constraints.

The digital revolution has led to the digitization of human behavior, creating unprecedented opportunities to understand observable actions on an unmatched scale. Emerging phenomena such as crowdfunding and crowdsourcing have further illuminated consumer behavior while also introducing new behavioral patterns. However, the sheer volume and complexity of this data present significant challenges for marketing researchers and practitioners. Traditional methods used to analyze consumer data fall short in handling the breadth, precision, and scale of emerging data sources. To address this, computational methods have been developed to manage the "big data" associated with consumer behavior, which typically includes structured data, textual data, audial data, and visual data. These methods, particularly machine learning, allow for effective parsing and processing of multi-faceted data. Given these recent developments, this review article seeks to familiarize researchers and practitioners with new data sources and analysis techniques for studying consumer behavior at scale. It serves as an introduction to the application of computational social science in understanding and leveraging publicly available consumer data.

Nowadays, machine learning (ML) is being used in software systems with multiple application fields, from medicine to software engineering (SE). On the one hand, the popularity of ML in the industry can be seen in the statistics showing its growth and adoption. On the other hand, its popularity can also be seen in research, particularly in SE, where not only have multiple studies been published in SE conferences and journals but also in the multiple workshops and co-located conferences in software engineering conferences. At the same time, researchers and practitioners have shown that machine learning has some particular challenges and pitfalls. In particular, research has shown that ML-enabled systems have a different development process than traditional SE, which also describes some of the challenges of ML applications. In order to mitigate some of the identified challenges and pitfalls, white and gray literature has proposed a set of recommendations based on their own experiences and focused on their domain (e.g., biomechanics), but for the best of our knowledge, there is no guideline focused on the SE community. This thesis aims to reduce this gap by answering research questions that help to understand the practices used and discussed by practitioners and researchers in the SE community by analyzing possible sources of practices such as question and answer communities and also previous research studies to present a set of practices with an SE perspective.