Goto

Collaborating Authors

 representing activity context


On Representing Activity Context via Semantic Rule Methods (Summary of Invited Talk)

AAAI Conferences

We analyze several of the key technical and practical challenges involved in representing activity context across a large variety of knowledge, components, and applications. We present two novel broad methods that enable semantic knowledge capture and interchange, and suggest how they can be used for activity context-awareness. The first is knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) in Rulelog, an expressively extended form of declarative logic programs that features defeasible higher-order logic formulas yet is computationally tractable, and is a draft dialect of W3C RIF. Rulelog's expressiveness enables representation of exceptions and change, and thus processes, agreements, and policies, e.g., for confidentiality. The second broad method is Textual Logic, an approach to mapping between natural language (text) and logic, where the mapping itself is logic-based. Textual Logic leverages Rulelog's expressiveness to enable relatively rapid text-based authoring of rich knowledge, reducing the knowledge acquisition bottleneck. Together, Rulelog and Textual Logic help address the potential for ontological and KRR Babel that lurks when representing activity context using previous semantic technologies.


Defining and Representing Activity Context for Systems Analysis

AAAI Conferences

Representing context information associated with people and digital devices performing activities is presented using a formal systems model based on a legal but simplified version of set theory. A five set Venn diagram, the PentaVenn diagram, allows analysts to work using a graphical logic rather than with equations. Model symmetry is shown to facilitate identifying different types of context, tangible and intangible.