rephrased question
Bias in the Mirror: Are LLMs opinions robust to their own adversarial attacks ?
Rennard, Virgile, Xypolopoulos, Christos, Vazirgiannis, Michalis
Evaluating language models inherit biases through both their biases across multiple languages is critical as training and alignment processes (Feng et al., 2023; LLMs trained in one linguistic and cultural context Scherrer et al., 2024; Motoki et al., 2024). Identifying may not generalize fairly or accurately to others, the opinions and values that LLMs possess has leading to culturally inappropriate or biased outputs been a particularly intriguing area of research, as it when used globally. Our multilingual experiments carries significant sociological and quantitative implications further reveal that models exhibit different for real-world applications (Naous et al., biases in their secondary languages, such as Arabic 2023). Understanding the biases embedded in these and Chinese, which underscores the importance of powerful tools is crucial, given their widespread cross-linguistic evaluations in understanding bias use and the potential influence they may exert on resilience. Furthermore, we introduce a comprehensive users, often in unintended ways (Hartmann et al., human evaluation to compare how humans 2023) or in downstream tasks, such as content moderation.
Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves
Deng, Yihe, Zhang, Weitong, Chen, Zixiang, Gu, Quanquan
Misunderstandings arise not only in interpersonal communication but also between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs). Such discrepancies can make LLMs interpret seemingly unambiguous questions in unexpected ways, yielding incorrect responses. While it is widely acknowledged that the quality of a prompt, such as a question, significantly impacts the quality of the response provided by LLMs, a systematic method for crafting questions that LLMs can better comprehend is still underdeveloped. In this paper, we present a method named `Rephrase and Respond' (RaR), which allows LLMs to rephrase and expand questions posed by humans and provide responses in a single prompt. This approach serves as a simple yet effective prompting method for improving performance. We also introduce a two-step variant of RaR, where a rephrasing LLM first rephrases the question and then passes the original and rephrased questions together to a different responding LLM. This facilitates the effective utilization of rephrased questions generated by one LLM with another. Our experiments demonstrate that our methods significantly improve the performance of different models across a wide range to tasks. We further provide a comprehensive comparison between RaR and the popular Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods, both theoretically and empirically. We show that RaR is complementary to CoT and can be combined with CoT to achieve even better performance. Our work not only contributes to enhancing LLM performance efficiently and effectively but also sheds light on a fair evaluation of LLM capabilities. Data and codes are available at https://github.com/uclaml/Rephrase-and-Respond.
Towards Transparent Interactive Semantic Parsing via Step-by-Step Correction
Mo, Lingbo, Lewis, Ashley, Sun, Huan, White, Michael
Existing studies on semantic parsing focus primarily on mapping a natural-language utterance to a corresponding logical form in one turn. However, because natural language can contain a great deal of ambiguity and variability, this is a difficult challenge. In this work, we investigate an interactive semantic parsing framework that explains the predicted logical form step by step in natural language and enables the user to make corrections through natural-language feedback for individual steps. We focus on question answering over knowledge bases (KBQA) as an instantiation of our framework, aiming to increase the transparency of the parsing process and help the user appropriately trust the final answer. To do so, we construct INSPIRED, a crowdsourced dialogue dataset derived from the ComplexWebQuestions dataset. Our experiments show that the interactive framework with human feedback has the potential to greatly improve overall parse accuracy. Furthermore, we develop a pipeline for dialogue simulation to evaluate our framework w.r.t. a variety of state-of-the-art KBQA models without involving further crowdsourcing effort. The results demonstrate that our interactive semantic parsing framework promises to be effective across such models.