regularization path
- Europe > Germany (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Belmont (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.70)
- Europe > France > Normandy > Seine-Maritime > Rouen (0.04)
- Europe > France > Occitanie > Haute-Garonne > Toulouse (0.04)
- Europe > France > Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (0.04)
- Europe > France > Normandy > Seine-Maritime > Rouen (0.04)
- Europe > France > Occitanie > Haute-Garonne > Toulouse (0.04)
- Europe > France > Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (0.04)
- North America > United States > Florida > Miami-Dade County > Miami (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Europe > Germany (0.05)
- South America > Argentina (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Catalonia > Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Connecting Optimization and Regularization Paths
Consequently, a line of work has focused on characterizing the implicit biases of global optimum reached by various optimization algorithms. For example, Gunasekar et al. [ 2017 ] consider the problem of matrix factorization and show that gradient descent (GD) on un-regularized objective converges to the minimum nuclear norm solution.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
A fast algorithm for solving the lasso problem exactly without homotopy using differential inclusions
Langlois, Gabriel P., Darbon, Jérôme
We prove in this work that the well-known lasso problem can be solved exactly without homotopy using novel differential inclusions techniques. Specifically, we show that a selection principle from the theory of differential inclusions transforms the dual lasso problem into the problem of calculating the trajectory of a projected dynamical system that we prove is integrable. Our analysis yields an exact algorithm for the lasso problem, numerically up to machine precision, that is amenable to computing regularization paths and is very fast. Moreover, we show the continuation of solutions to the integrable projected dynamical system in terms of the hyperparameter naturally yields a rigorous homotopy algorithm. Numerical experiments confirm that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms in both efficiency and accuracy. Beyond this work, we expect our results and analysis can be adapted to compute exact or approximate solutions to a broader class of polyhedral-constrained optimization problems.
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)