Abstract--Ride-hailing platforms are characterized by high-frequency, behavior-driven environments, such as shared mobility platforms. Although survival analysis has been widely applied to recurrent events in other domains, its use for modeling ride-hailing driver behavior remains largely unexplored. T o the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to formulate driver idle behavior as a recurrent survival process using large-scale platform data. This study proposes a survival analysis framework that uses a Transformer-based temporal encoder with causal masking to capture long-term temporal dependencies and embeds driver-specific embeddings to represent latent individual characteristics, significantly enhancing the personalized prediction of driver retention risk, modeling how historical idle sequences influence the current risk of leaving the platform via trip acceptance or log-off. The model is validated on datasets from the City of T oronto over the period January 2 to March 13, 2020. The results show that the proposed Frailty-A ware Cox Transformer (F ACT) delivers the highest time-dependent C-indices and the lowest Brier Scores across early, median, and late follow-up, demonstrating its robustness in capturing evolving risk over a driver's lifecycle. This study enables operators to optimize retention strategies and helps policy makers assess shared mobility's role in equitable and integrated transportation systems. The purpose of this study is to model the driver retention behavior through a transformer-based survival model. Shared mobility services, such as ride-hailing, car-sharing, and bike-sharing, are becoming an increasingly prominent component of contemporary transportation systems. These services are central to the broader concept of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) [1], which aims to integrate various forms of transport into a unified and user-centric platform.

In applications such as biomedical studies, epidemiology, and social sciences, recurrent events often co-occur with longitudinal measurements and a terminal event, such as death. Therefore, jointly modeling longitudinal measurements, recurrent events, and survival data while accounting for their dependencies is critical. While joint models for the three components exist in statistical literature, many of these approaches are limited by heavy parametric assumptions and scalability issues. Recently, incorporating deep learning techniques into joint modeling has shown promising results. However, current methods only address joint modeling of longitudinal measurements at regularly-spaced observation times and survival events, neglecting recurrent events. In this paper, we develop TransformerLSR, a flexible transformer-based deep modeling and inference framework to jointly model all three components simultaneously. TransformerLSR integrates deep temporal point processes into the joint modeling framework, treating recurrent and terminal events as two competing processes dependent on past longitudinal measurements and recurrent event times. Additionally, TransformerLSR introduces a novel trajectory representation and model architecture to potentially incorporate a priori knowledge of known latent structures among concurrent longitudinal variables. We demonstrate the effectiveness and necessity of TransformerLSR through simulation studies and analyzing a real-world medical dataset on patients after kidney transplantation.

We study causal inference and efficient estimation for the expected number of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event. We define our estimand as the vector comprising both the expected number of recurrent events and the failure survival function evaluated along a sequence of landmark times. We identify the estimand in the presence of right-censoring and causal selection as an observed data functional under coarsening at random, derive the nonparametric efficiency bound, and propose a multiply-robust estimator that achieves the bound and permits nonparametric estimation of nuisance parameters. Throughout, no absolute continuity assumption is made on the underlying probability distributions of failure, censoring, or the observed data. Additionally, we derive the class of influence functions when the coarsening distribution is known and review how published estimators may belong to the class. Along the way, we highlight some interesting inconsistencies in the causal lifetime analysis literature.