Traditional recommender systems have relied heavily on positive feedback for learning user preferences, while the abundance of negative feedback in real-world scenarios remains underutilized. To address this limitation, recent years have witnessed increasing attention on leveraging negative feedback in recommender systems to enhance recommendation performance. However, existing methods face three major challenges: limited model compatibility, ineffective information exchange, and computational inefficiency. To overcome these challenges, we propose a modelagnostic Signed Dual-Channel Graph Contrastive Learning (SDCGCL) framework that can be seamlessly integrated with existing graph contrastive learning methods. The framework features three key components: (1) a Dual-Channel Graph Embedding that separately processes positive and negative graphs, (2) a Cross-Channel Distribution Calibration mechanism to maintain structural consistency, and (3) an Adaptive Prediction Strategy that effectively combines signals from both channels. Building upon this framework, we further propose a Dual-channel Feedback Fusion (DualFuse) model and develop a two-stage optimization strategy to ensure efficient training. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by substantial margins while exhibiting minimal computational complexity.

Recommendation models are predominantly trained using implicit user feedback, since explicit feedback is often costly to obtain. However, implicit feedback, such as clicks, does not always reflect users' real preferences.

The emergence of agentic recommender systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a paradigm shift in personalized recommendations, leveraging LLMs' advanced reasoning and role-playing capabilities to enable autonomous, adaptive decision-making. Unlike traditional recommendation approaches, agentic recommender systems can dynamically gather and interpret user-item interactions from complex environments, generating robust recommendation strategies that generalize across diverse scenarios. However, the field currently lacks standardized evaluation protocols to systematically assess these methods. To address this critical gap, we propose: (1) an interactive textual recommendation simulator incorporating rich user and item metadata and three typical evaluation scenarios (classic, evolvinginterest, and cold-start recommendation tasks); (2) a unified modular framework for developing agentic recommender systems; and (3) the first comprehensive benchmark comparing over 10 classical and agentic recommendation methods. Our findings demonstrate the superiority of agentic systems and establish actionable design guidelines for their core components.

Recommender systems are among the most impactful AI applications, interacting with billions of users every day, guiding them to relevant products, services, or information tailored to their preferences. However, the research and development of recommender systems are hindered by existing datasets that fail to capture realistic user behaviors and inconsistent evaluation settings that lead to ambiguous conclusions. This paper introduces the Open Recommendation Benchmark for Reproducible Research with HIdden Tests (ORBIT), a unified benchmark for consistent and realistic evaluation of recommendation models. ORBIT offers a standardized evaluation framework of public datasets with reproducible splits and transparent settings for its public leaderboard. Additionally, ORBIT introduces a new webpage recommendation task, ClueWeb-Reco, featuring web browsing sequences from 87 million public, high-quality webpages. ClueWeb-Reco is a synthetic dataset derived from real, user-consented, and privacy-guaranteed browsing data.

Regression models are crucial in recommender systems. However, retransformation bias problem has been conspicuously neglected within the community. While many works in other fields have devised effective bias correction methods, all of them are post-hoc cures externally to the model, facing practical challenges when applied to real-world recommender systems. Hence, we propose a preemptive paradigm to eradicate the bias intrinsically from the models via minor model refinement. Specifically, a novel TranSUN method is proposed with a joint bias learning manner to offer theoretically guaranteed unbiasedness under empirical superior convergence. It is further generalized into a novel generic regression model family, termed Generalized TranSUN (GTS), which not only offers more theoretical insights but also serves as a generic framework for flexibly developing various bias-free models. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our methods across data from various domains, which have been successfully deployed in two real-world industrial recommendation scenarios, i.e. product and short video recommendation scenarios in Guess What You Like business domain in the homepage of Taobao App (a leading e-commerce platform with DAU > 300M), to serve the major online traffic.

Conventional research on large language models (LLMs) has primarily focused on refining output distributions, while paying less attention to the decoding process that transforms these distributions into final responses. Recent advances, such as scaling the computation of inference time with reward models, have underscored the importance of decoding, but these methods often suffer from high computational costs and limited applicability. In this paper, we revisit LLM generation through the lens of recommender systems, conceptualizing the decoding process as analogous to the ranking stage in recommendation pipelines. From this perspective, we observe that both traditional decoding methods and reward models exhibit clear limitations such as redundancy. Motivated by this insight, we propose Language Ranker, a novel framework that introduces a lightweight module to rerank candidate responses using features extracted by the base model. Experiments across a wide range of tasks show that Language Ranker achieves performance comparable to large-scale reward models, while requiring only <0.5M additional parameters, significantly reducing the computational overhead during both training and inference stages. This highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of our method, showcasing its potential to fully unlock the capabilities of LLMs.

Traditional recommender systems have relied heavily on positive feedback for learning user preferences, while the abundance of negative feedback in real-world scenarios remains underutilized. To address this limitation, recent years have witnessed increasing attention on leveraging negative feedback in recommender systems to enhance recommendation performance. However, existing methods face three major challenges: limited model compatibility, ineffective information exchange, and computational inefficiency. To overcome these challenges, we propose a model-agnostic Signed Dual-Channel Graph Contrastive Learning (SDCGCL) framework that can be seamlessly integrated with existing graph contrastive learning methods. The framework features three key components: (1) a Dual-Channel Graph Embedding that separately processes positive and negative graphs, (2) a Cross-Channel Distribution Calibration mechanism to maintain structural consistency, and (3) an Adaptive Prediction Strategy that effectively combines signals from both channels. Building upon this framework, we further propose a Dual-channel Feedback Fusion (DualFuse) model and develop a two-stage optimization strategy to ensure efficient training. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by substantial margins while exhibiting minimal computational complexity.

Mainstream approaches follow the learning-to-rank paradigm, which focuses on discovering and modeling item topics (e.g., categories) and capturing user preferences for these topics based on historical interactions. However, this paradigm often neglects the modeling of user characteristics and their social roles, which are logical confounders influencing the correlated interests and user preference transition. To bridge this gap, we introduce the user role identification task and the behavioral logic modeling task that aim to explicitly model user roles and learn the logical relations between item topics and user social roles. We show that it is possible to explicitly solve these tasks through an efficient integration framework of Large Language Model (LLM) and recommendation systems, for which we propose TagCF. On the one hand, TagCF exploits the (Multi-modal) LLM's world knowledge and logic inference ability to extract realistic tag-based virtual logic graphs that reveal dynamic and expressive knowledge of users, refining our understanding of user behaviors. On the other hand, TagCF presents empirically effective integration modules that take advantage of the extracted tag-logic information, augmenting the recommendation performance. We conduct both online experiments with an industrial environment and offline experiments on public datasets to verify TagCF's effectiveness, and we empirically show that the user role modeling strategy is potentially a better choice than the modeling of item topics. Additionally, we provide evidence that the extracted logic graphs are empirically a general and transferable knowledge that can benefit a wide range of recommendation tasks. Our code is available in https://github.com/Code2Q/TagCF.

Graph-based recommender systems have achieved remarkable effectiveness by modeling high-order interactions between users and items. However, such approaches are significantly undermined by popularity bias, which distorts the interaction graph's structure--referred to as topology bias. This leads to overrepresentation of popular items, thereby reinforcing biases and fairness issues through the user-system feedback loop. Despite attempts to study this effect, most prior work focuses on the embedding or gradient level bias, overlooking how topology bias fundamentally distorts the message passing process itself. We bridge this gap by providing an empirical and theoretical analysis from a Dirichlet energy perspective, revealing that graph message passing inherently amplifies topology bias and consistently benefits highly connected nodes. To address these limitations, we propose Test-time Simplicial Propagation (TSP), which extends message passing to higher-order simplicial complexes. By incorporating richer structures beyond pairwise connections, TSP mitigates harmful topology bias and substantially improves the representation and recommendation of long-tail items during inference. Extensive experiments across five real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach in mitigating topology bias and enhancing recommendation quality. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/sotaagi/TSP.

In recommendation systems, implicit feedback data can be automatically recorded and is more common than explicit feedback data. However, implicit feedback poses two challenges for relevance prediction, namely (a) positive-unlabeled (PU): negative feedback does not necessarily imply low relevance and (b) missing not at random (MNAR): items that are popular or frequently recommended tend to receive more clicks than other items, even if the user does not have a significant interest in them. Existing methods either overlook the MNAR issue or fail to account for the inherent mechanism of the PU issue. As a result, they may lead to inaccurate relevance predictions or inflated biases and variances. In this paper, we formulate the implicit feedback problem as a counterfactual estimation problem with missing treatment variables.