In this section, we present some preliminary results that will be useful in proving Theorem 3.2, Theorem 3.3 and Proposition 3.4. We draw upon existing theory on properties of random kernel matrices and extend these properties to cluster-correlated data. Specifically, we show the convergence of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of an empirical kernel matrix based on clustered data. Let (X,F,P) be a probability space and H be a Hilbert space over (X,F,P) with a symmetric kernel function k: X X R. Let H be a compact operator on H, defined by Hg(x) = Z Equivalently, Hn can be viewed as an n nreal matrix whose (i,j)-th entry is {Hn}i,j = 1 n k(Xi,Xj). This is the empirical kernel matrix scaled by a factor of 1/n. Here we restrict our discussion to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) H, where the kernel function k is positive semi-definite. We also assume that the operator H is Hilbert-Schmidt, with E[k2(X,X0)] < . Let λ(T) denote the spectrum of a compact, symmetric operator T. Then λ(H) and λ(Hn) are the sets of eigenvalues for H and Hn, respectively.

We consider learning the structures of Gaussian latent tree models with vector observations when a subset of them are arbitrarily corrupted. First, we present the sample complexities of Recursive Grouping (RG) and Chow-Liu Recursive Grouping (CLRG) without the assumption that the effective depth is bounded in the number of observed nodes, significantly generalizing the results in Choi et al. (2011). We show that Chow-Liu initialization in CLRG greatly reduces the sample complexity of RG from being exponential in the diameter of the tree to only logarithmic in the diameter for the hidden Markov model (HMM).

EVEN supervised learning is subject to the famous NoFree Lunch Theorems [1]-[3], which say that, in combinatorial optimization, there is no universal algorithm that works better than its competitors for every objective function [4]-[6]. Indeed, David Wolpert has recently proven that, on average, cross-validation performs as well as anti-crossvalidation (choosing among a set of candidate algorithms based on which has the worst out-of-sample behavior) for supervised learning. Still, he acknowledges that "it is hard to imagine any scientist who would not prefer to use [crossvalidation] to using anti-cross-validation" [7]. On the other hand, unsupervised learning has seldom been studied from the perspective of the NFLTs. This may be because the adjective "unsupervised" suggests that no human input is needed, which is misleading as many unsupervised tasks are combinatorial optimization problems that depend on the choice of the objective function. For instance, it is well known that, among the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix, Principal Components Analysis selects those with the largest variances [8]. However, mode-hunting techniques that rely on spectral manipulation aim at the opposite objective: selecting the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix with the smallest variances [9], [10]. Therefore, unlike in supervised learning, where it is difficult to identify reasons to optimize with respect to anti-cross-validation, in unsupervised learning there are strong reasons to reduce dimensionality for variance minimization. D. A. D ıaz-Pach on and T. Liu are with the Division of Biostatistics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136 USA (e-mail: ddiaz3@miami.edu,

We establish convergence of the training dynamics of residual neural networks (ResNets) to their joint infinite depth L, hidden width M, and embedding dimension D limit. Specifically, we consider ResNets with two-layer perceptron blocks in the maximal local feature update (MLU) regime and prove that, after a bounded number of training steps, the error between the ResNet and its large-scale limit is O(1/L + sqrt(D/(L M)) + 1/sqrt(D)). This error rate is empirically tight when measured in embedding space. For a budget of P = Theta(L M D) parameters, this yields a convergence rate O(P^(-1/6)) for the scalings of (L, M, D) that minimize the bound. Our analysis exploits in an essential way the depth-two structure of residual blocks and applies formally to a broad class of state-of-the-art architectures, including Transformers with bounded key-query dimension. From a technical viewpoint, this work completes the program initiated in the companion paper [Chi25] where it is proved that for a fixed embedding dimension D, the training dynamics converges to a Mean ODE dynamics at rate O(1/L + sqrt(D)/sqrt(L M)). Here, we study the large-D limit of this Mean ODE model and establish convergence at rate O(1/sqrt(D)), yielding the above bound by a triangle inequality. To handle the rich probabilistic structure of the limit dynamics and obtain one of the first rigorous quantitative convergence for a DMFT-type limit, we combine the cavity method with propagation of chaos arguments at a functional level on so-called skeleton maps, which express the weight updates as functions of CLT-type sums from the past.

Theoretically,Falconn++ asymptotically achieves lower query time complexity than Falconn, an optimal locality-sensitive hashing scheme on angular distance.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

In this section, we present some additional experiments. Empirical setup Most of the experimental setups are the same as those in Section 6, except that now we use 5 parties instead of 3 parties. There are 90 dimensions for a single data in YearPredictionMSD dataset, and we let each party hold 18 dimensions. Empirical results We plot the training loss instead of the testing loss since we are comparing differentobjectivefunctions. A.4 Experimentsonotherdatasets In this section, we present the experiment results on another dataset.