precision loss
Probably Approximately Precision and Recall Learning
Cohen, Lee, Mansour, Yishay, Moran, Shay, Shao, Han
Precision and Recall are foundational metrics in machine learning where both accurate predictions and comprehensive coverage are essential, such as in recommender systems and multi-label learning. In these tasks, balancing precision (the proportion of relevant items among those predicted) and recall (the proportion of relevant items successfully predicted) is crucial. A key challenge is that one-sided feedback--where only positive examples are observed during training--is inherent in many practical problems. For instance, in recommender systems like YouTube, training data only consists of videos that a user has actively selected, while unselected items remain unseen. Despite this lack of negative feedback in training, avoiding undesirable recommendations at test time is essential. We introduce a PAC learning framework where each hypothesis is represented by a graph, with edges indicating positive interactions, such as between users and items. This framework subsumes the classical binary and multi-class PAC learning models as well as multi-label learning with partial feedback, where only a single random correct label per example is observed, rather than all correct labels. Our work uncovers a rich statistical and algorithmic landscape, with nuanced boundaries on what can and cannot be learned. Notably, classical methods like Empirical Risk Minimization fail in this setting, even for simple hypothesis classes with only two hypotheses. To address these challenges, we develop novel algorithms that learn exclusively from positive data, effectively minimizing both precision and recall losses. Specifically, in the realizable setting, we design algorithms that achieve optimal sample complexity guarantees. In the agnostic case, we show that it is impossible to achieve additive error guarantees--as is standard in PAC learning--and instead obtain meaningful multiplicative approximations.
Confidential Computing on nVIDIA H100 GPU: A Performance Benchmark Study
Zhu, Jianwei, Yin, Hang, Deng, Peng, Zhou, Shunfan
This report evaluates the performance impact of enabling Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) on nVIDIA H100 GPUs for large language model (LLM) inference tasks. We benchmark the overhead introduced by TEE mode across various LLMs and token lengths, with a particular focus on the bottleneck caused by CPU-GPU data transfers via PCIe. Our results indicate that while there is minimal computational overhead within the GPU, the overall performance penalty is primarily attributable to data transfer. For the majority of typical LLM queries, the overhead remains below 5%, with larger models and longer sequences experiencing nearly zero overhead.
DMS: Addressing Information Loss with More Steps for Pragmatic Adversarial Attacks
Zhu, Zhiyu, Zhang, Jiayu, Wang, Xinyi, Jin, Zhibo, Chen, Huaming
Despite the exceptional performance of deep neural networks (DNNs) across different domains, they are vulnerable to adversarial samples, in particular for tasks related to computer vision. Such vulnerability is further influenced by the digital container formats used in computers, where the discrete numerical values are commonly used for storing the pixel values. This paper examines how information loss in file formats impacts the effectiveness of adversarial attacks. Notably, we observe a pronounced hindrance to the adversarial attack performance due to the information loss of the non-integer pixel values. To address this issue, we explore to leverage the gradient information of the attack samples within the model to mitigate the information loss. We introduce the Do More Steps (DMS) algorithm, which hinges on two core techniques: gradient ascent-based \textit{adversarial integerization} (DMS-AI) and integrated gradients-based \textit{attribution selection} (DMS-AS). Our goal is to alleviate such lossy process to retain the attack performance when storing these adversarial samples digitally. In particular, DMS-AI integerizes the non-integer pixel values according to the gradient direction, and DMS-AS selects the non-integer pixels by comparing attribution results. We conduct thorough experiments to assess the effectiveness of our approach, including the implementations of the DMS-AI and DMS-AS on two large-scale datasets with various latest gradient-based attack methods. Our empirical findings conclusively demonstrate the superiority of our proposed DMS-AI and DMS-AS pixel integerization methods over the standardised methods, such as rounding, truncating and upper approaches, in maintaining attack integrity.