A.1 Details of Dimension Design We argue that multi-dimensional evaluation is significant to visual caption evaluation and is more comprehensive than previous work. So how to choose proper dimensions? We refer to existing VQA benchmarks [62, 63, 64, 65] and visual generation benchmarks [31, 32, 33]. VQA benchmarks usually design various types of questions to include multi-dimensional evaluation and analysis of MLLMs. For instance, MMBench [64] defines 20 ability dimensions, including attribute recognition, attribute comparison, action recognition, spatial relationship, physical property, OCR, object localization, image style, image scene, identity reasoning, etc. MVBench [64] covers 20 challenging video tasks including action, object, position, count, scene, pose, attribute, character, cognition, etc. Due to the flexible design of questions, VQA benchmarks can be naturally built with comprehensive dimensions. Different from the VQA task, the visual caption task does not require specific questions, but inspects the alignment of visual and textual information. Visual generation is the inverse task of visual captioning, as it requires models to generate specific visual content based on detailed textual descriptions. GenEval [31] designs 6 different tasks to evaluate text-to-image alignment, including single object, two object, counting, colors, position, and attribute binding. VBench [32] comprises 16 dimensions, including subject consistency, background consistency, object class, human action, color, spatial relationship, scene, style, etc. We follow their explored dimensions to design proper dimensions for visual captioning. Finally, we design 6 views, covering object, global, text, camera, temporal, and knowledge. The object-related view includes object category, object color, object 1 number, and spatial relation, the global-related view includes scene and style, the text-related view evaluates the OCR capability of captions, the camera-related view covers the camera angle and movement, the temporal-related view contains action and event, and we also design a view to evaluate the knowledge of MLLMs, i.e., character identification. We believe these dimensions contribute to a comprehensive visual caption benchmarking.

Figure 1: (a) Precision (blue) and recall (orange) for Figure 2: (a) Real data covers five modes (1-5) and several neighborhood sizes k. Both metrics were evaluated using 20k real and of varying sample count. Figure 1a illustrates the effect of varying k in the setup used in Figure 4b of the submission (truncation sweep 4 in StyleGAN, VGG-16 features, 50k samples). In general, different k yield consistent results and affect mainly the 5 saturation towards 0 or 1. Therefore, selecting k is a tradeoff between under-or overestimating the manifolds.

Calcium imaging is an important technique for monitoring the activity of thousands of neurons simultaneously. As calcium imaging datasets grow in size, automated detection of individual neurons is becoming important. Here we apply a supervised learning approach to this problem and show that convolutional networks can achieve near-human accuracy and superhuman speed. Accuracy is superior to the popular PCA/ICA method based on precision and recall relative to ground truth annotation by a human expert. These results suggest that convolutional networks are an efficient and flexible tool for the analysis of large-scale calcium imaging data.

Classical anomaly detection is principally concerned with point-based anomalies, those anomalies that occur at a single point in time. Yet, many real-world anomalies are range-based, meaning they occur over a period of time. Motivated by this observation, we present a new mathematical model to evaluate the accuracy of time series classification algorithms. Our model expands the well-known Precision and Recall metrics to measure ranges, while simultaneously enabling customization support for domain-specific preferences.

Recent advances in generative modeling have led to an increased interest in the study of statistical divergences as means of model comparison. Commonly used evaluation methods, such as the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), correlate well with the perceived quality of samples and are sensitive to mode dropping. However, these metrics are unable to distinguish between different failure cases since they only yield one-dimensional scores. We propose a novel definition of precision and recall for distributions which disentangles the divergence into two separate dimensions. The proposed notion is intuitive, retains desirable properties, and naturally leads to an efficient algorithm that can be used to evaluate generative models. We relate this notion to total variation as well as to recent evaluation metrics such as Inception Score and FID. To demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed approach we perform an empirical study on several variants of Generative Adversarial Networks and Variational Autoencoders. In an extensive set of experiments we show that the proposed metric is able to disentangle the quality of generated samples from the coverage of the target distribution.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Akeytechnical step inourproofsisaparticular optimizationproblem oftheL2-Wasserstein distance over a constrained set of distributions.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/