Decision-making in various fields, such as medicine, is heavily based on conditional average treatment effects (CATEs). Practitioners commonly make decisions by checking whether the estimated CATE is positive, even though the decision-making performance of modern CATE estimators (meta-learners) is poorly understood. In this paper, we study optimal decision-making based on two-stage meta-learners (e.g., DR-learner), which estimate CATE via a second-stage regression. We show that these meta-learners can be suboptimal when used for decision-making in common settings where the second-stage regression is over a restricted function class (e.g., when using regularization or employing fairness/interpretability constraints). Intuitively, this occurs because such estimators prioritize CATE accuracy in regions far away from the decision boundary, which is ultimately irrelevant to decision-making. As a remedy, we propose a novel two-stage learning objective that re-targets the CATE to balance CATE estimation error and decision performance. We then propose a neural method that optimizes an adaptively-smoothed approximation of our learning objective. Finally, we confirm the effectiveness of our method both empirically and theoretically.

We develop an anytime-valid framework for optimal policy identification from logged contextual bandit data. In many applied settings, the analyst wants to select the optimal policy from a candidate policy class $Π$, but data are generated by an externally determined logging policy that they do not control. The analyst may also wish to monitor evidence continuously, stopping once the optimal policy is clear rather than committing to a fixed sample size in advance. This paper addresses these challenges by constructing a time-indexed set $S_t$ that retains the true optimal policy set uniformly over time with high probability. The resulting procedure allows the analyst to monitor policy values, eliminate clearly suboptimal policies, and stop at data-dependent times without invalidating inference. When the optimal policy is unique, we define a stopping time for its identification and derive a sample-complexity bound scaling as $O\!\left(\frac{\log |Π|+\log\log(1/Δ_{\min})}{Δ_{\min}^2}\right)$, where $Δ_{\min}$ is the gap between the best and second-best policy values. Simulations demonstrate that the anytime-valid approach can yield substantial sample savings relative to fixed-$N$ designs. An application to a large adaptive experiment on reducing misinformation online illustrates how the method provides a dynamic view as evidence on the optimal policy accumulates.

We consider off-policy evaluation (OPE) in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) with unobserved confounding. Recent advances have introduced bridge-function to circumvent unmeasured confounding and develop estimators for the policy value, yet the statistical error bounds of them related to the length of horizon T and the size of the state-action space |O||A| remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we systematically investigate the finite-sample error bounds of OPE estimators in finite-horizon tabular confounded POMDPs. Specifically, we show that under certain rank conditions, the estimation error for policy value can achieve a rate of O(T1.5/ n), excluding the cardinality of the observation space |O| and the action space |A|. With an additional mild condition on the concentrability coefficients in confounded POMDPs, the rate of estimation error can be improved to O(T/ n).

We consider off-policy evaluation (OPE) in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) with unobserved confounding. Recent advances have introduced bridge-function to circumvent unmeasured confounding and develop estimators for the policy value, yet the statistical error bounds of them related to the length of horizon $T$ and the size of the state-action space $|\mathcal{O}||\mathcal{A}|$ remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we systematically investigate the finite-sample error bounds of OPE estimators in finite-horizon tabular confounded POMDPs. Specifically, we show that under certain rank conditions, the estimation error for policy value can achieve a rate of $\mathcal{O}(T^{1.5}/\sqrt{n})$,

Traditional insurance pricing relies on risk-based principles that ensure actuarial fairness and solvency but do not explicitly account for policyholders' price sensitivity. We formulate insurance pricing as a decision-making problem and study it using tools from off-policy evaluation and stochastic control. We propose a kernelized inverse propensity score estimator that exploits local structure in the action space and yields variance reduction compared to the classical inverse propensity score estimator. Building on these value estimates, we investigate policy optimization and present two practical approaches for computing optimal pricing rules: an interpretable data-shared Lasso formulation and a flexible policy parameterization based on neural networks. Using a controlled synthetic travel insurance environment, we empirically confirm the theoretical results and show that neural networks outperform existing techniques for policy optimization.

We study the problem of off-policy evaluation (OPE) for episodic Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) with continuous states. Motivated by the recently proposed proximal causal inference framework, we develop a non-parametric identification result for estimating the policy value via a sequence of so-called V-bridge functions with the help of time-dependent proxy variables. We then develop a fitted-Q-evaluation-type algorithm to estimate V-bridge functions recursively, where a non-parametric instrumental variable (NPIV) problem is solved at each step. By analyzing this challenging sequential NPIV problem, we establish the finite-sample error bounds for estimating the V-bridge functions and accordingly that for evaluating the policy value, in terms of the sample size, length of horizon and so-called (local) measure of ill-posedness at each step. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first finite-sample error bound for OPE in POMDPs under non-parametric models.

We study the evaluation of a policy under best-and worst-case perturbations to a Markov decision process (MDP), using transition observations from the original MDP, whether they are generated under the same or a different policy. This is an important problem when there is the possibility of a shift between historical and future environments, \emph{e.g.} due to unmeasured confounding, distributional shift, or an adversarial environment. We propose a perturbation model that allows changes in the transition kernel densities up to a given multiplicative factor or its reciprocal, extending the classic marginal sensitivity model (MSM) for single time-step decision-making to infinite-horizon RL. We characterize the sharp bounds on policy value under this model -- \emph{i.e.}, the tightest possible bounds based on transition observations from the original MDP -- and we study the estimation of these bounds from such transition observations. We develop an estimator with several important guarantees: it is semiparametrically efficient, and remains so even when certain necessary nuisance functions, such as worst-case Q-functions, are estimated at slow, nonparametric rates. Our estimator is also asymptotically normal, enabling straightforward statistical inference using Wald confidence intervals. Moreover, when certain nuisances are estimated inconsistently, the estimator still provides valid, albeit possibly not sharp, bounds on the policy value.

This supplementary document is structured as follows.