Abstract Like electoral systems, decision-making methods are also vulnerable to manipulation by decision-makers. The ability to effectively defend against such threats can only come from thoroughly understanding the manipulation mechanisms. In the presented article, we show two algorithms that can be used to launch a manipulation attack. They allow for equating the weights of two selected alternatives in the pairwise comparison method and, consequently, choosing a leader. The theoretical considerations are accompanied by a Monte Carlo simulation showing the relationship between the size of the PC matrix, the degree of inconsistency, and the ease of manipulation. This work is a continuation of our previous research published in the paper (Szybowski et al., 2023)

Entities very often are referred to as alternatives, while the final result is in the form of a ranking. The first mention of pairwise comparison as a systematic ranking method comes from the 13th century and is attributed to Ramon Llull [7]. Lull proposed a procedure for selecting candidates based on comparing them in pairs. This technique might be viewed as in between the electoral system and a decisionmaking method in the modern sense. In later times, pairwise comparisons were used in the context of social choice and welfare theories [33, 25, 15], psychometric measurements [41, 16, 42] and decision-making methods [27]. In 1977, Saaty published his seminal paper introducing a new decision-making method: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [34]. AHP is based on the quantitative pairwise comparison of alternatives. As a result, each of the considered entities is assigned a weight that determines its importance.

We study the meta-learning for support (i.e. the set of non-zero entries) recovery in high-dimensional Principal Component Analysis. We reduce the sufficient sample complexity in a novel task with the information that is learned from auxiliary tasks. We assume each task to be a different random Principal Component (PC) matrix with a possibly different support and that the support union of the PC matrices is small. We then pool the data from all the tasks to execute an improper estimation of a single PC matrix by maximising the $l_1$-regularised predictive covariance to establish that with high probability the true support union can be recovered provided a sufficient number of tasks $m$ and a sufficient number of samples $ O\left(\frac{\log(p)}{m}\right)$ for each task, for $p$-dimensional vectors. Then, for a novel task, we prove that the maximisation of the $l_1$-regularised predictive covariance with the additional constraint that the support is a subset of the estimated support union could reduce the sufficient sample complexity of successful support recovery to $O(\log |J|)$, where $J$ is the support union recovered from the auxiliary tasks. Typically, $|J|$ would be much less than $p$ for sparse matrices. Finally, we demonstrate the validity of our experiments through numerical simulations.

Abstract--We consider the weighted belief-propagation (WBP) decoder recently proposed by Nachmani et al. Our focus is on simple-scaling models that use the same weights across certain edges to reduce the storage and computational burden. The main contribution is to show that simple scaling with few parameters often achieves the same gain as the full parameterization. Moreover, several training improvements for WBP are proposed. For example, it is shown that minimizing average binary cross-entropy is subopti-mal in general in terms of bit error rate (BER) and a new "soft-BER" loss is proposed which can lead to better performance. We also investigate parameter adapter networks (PANs) that learn the relation between the signal-to-noise ratio and the WBP parameters. As an example, for the (32, 16) Reed-Muller code with a highly redundant parity-check matrix, training a PAN with soft-BER loss gives near-maximum-likelihood performance assuming simple scaling with only three parameters.