A connection between the General Linear Model (GLM) in combination with classical statistical inference and the machine learning (MLE)-based inference is described in this paper. Firstly, the estimation of the GLM parameters is expressed as a Linear Regression Model (LRM) of an indicator matrix, that is, in terms of the inverse problem of regressing the observations. In other words, both approaches, i.e. GLM and LRM, apply to different domains, the observation and the label domains, and are linked by a normalization value at the least-squares solution. Subsequently, from this relationship we derive a statistical test based on a more refined predictive algorithm, i.e. the (non)linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) that maximizes the class margin of separation, within a permutation analysis. The MLE-based inference employs a residual score and includes the upper bound to compute a better estimation of the actual (real) error. Experimental results demonstrate how the parameter estimations derived from each model resulted in different classification performances in the equivalent inverse problem. Moreover, using real data the aforementioned predictive algorithms within permutation tests, including such model-free estimators, are able to provide a good trade-off between type I error and statistical power.

In this paper, we have extended the well-established universal approximator theory to neural networks that use the unbounded ReLU activation function and a nonlinear softmax output layer. We have proved that a sufficiently large neural network using the ReLU activation function can approximate any function in $L^1$ up to any arbitrary precision. Moreover, our theoretical results have shown that a large enough neural network using a nonlinear softmax output layer can also approximate any indicator function in $L^1$, which is equivalent to mutually-exclusive class labels in any realistic multiple-class pattern classification problems. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first theoretical justification for using the softmax output layers in neural networks for pattern classification.

We have done an empirical study of the relation of the number of parameters (weights) in a feedforward net to generalization performance.

We have done an empirical study of the relation of the number of parameters (weights) in a feedforward net to generalization performance.

We have done an empirical study of the relation of the number of parameters (weights) in a feedforward net to generalization performance.