Adapting to the addressee is crucial for successful explanations, yet poses significant challenges for dialogsystems. We adopt the approach of treating explanation generation as a non-stationary decision process, where the optimal strategy varies according to changing beliefs about the explainee and the interaction context. In this paper we address the questions of (1) how to track the interaction context and the relevant listener features in a formally defined computational partner model, and (2) how to utilize this model in the dynamically adjusted, rational decision process that determines the currently best explanation strategy. We propose a Bayesian inference-based approach to continuously update the partner model based on user feedback, and a non-stationary Markov Decision Process to adjust decision-making based on the partner model values. We evaluate an implementation of this framework with five simulated interlocutors, demonstrating its effectiveness in adapting to different partners with constant and even changing feedback behavior. The results show high adaptivity with distinct explanation strategies emerging for different partners, highlighting the potential of our approach to improve explainable AI systems and dialogsystems in general.

In explanations, explainers have mental representations of explainees' developing knowledge and shifting interests regarding the explanandum. These mental representations are dynamic in nature and develop over time, thereby enabling explainers to react to explainees' needs by adapting and customizing the explanation. XAI should be able to react to explainees' needs in a similar manner. Therefore, a component that incorporates aspects of explainers' mental representations of explainees is required. In this study, we took first steps by investigating explainers' mental representations in everyday explanations of technological artifacts. According to the dual nature theory, technological artifacts require explanations with two distinct perspectives, namely observable and measurable features addressing "Architecture" or interpretable aspects addressing "Relevance". We conducted extended semi structured pre-, post- and video recall-interviews with explainers (N=9) in the context of an explanation. The transcribed interviews were analyzed utilizing qualitative content analysis. The explainers' answers regarding the explainees' knowledge and interests with regard to the technological artifact emphasized the vagueness of early assumptions of explainers toward strong beliefs in the course of explanations. The assumed knowledge of explainees in the beginning is centered around Architecture and develops toward knowledge with regard to both Architecture and Relevance. In contrast, explainers assumed higher interests in Relevance in the beginning to interests regarding both Architecture and Relevance in the further course of explanations. Further, explainers often finished the explanation despite their perception that explainees still had gaps in knowledge. These findings are transferred into practical implications relevant for user models for adaptive explainable systems.

Large Language Models (LLMs) can justify or critique their predictions through discussions with other models or humans, thereby enriching their intrinsic understanding of instances. While proactive discussions in the inference phase have been shown to boost performance, such interactions have not been extensively explored during the training phase. We hypothesize that incorporating interactive discussions into the training process can enhance the models' understanding and improve their reasoning and verbal expression abilities during inference. This work introduces the SAIE framework, which facilitates supportive and adversarial discussions between learner and partner models. The learner model receives responses from the partner, and its parameters are then updated based on this discussion. This dynamic adjustment process continues throughout the training phase, responding to the evolving outputs of the learner model. Our empirical evaluation across various tasks, including math problems, commonsense reasoning, and multi-domain knowledge, demonstrates that models fine-tuned with the SAIE framework outperform those trained with conventional fine-tuning approaches. Furthermore, our method enhances the models' reasoning capabilities, improving both individual and multi-agent inference performance.

Perceptions of system competence and communicative ability, termed partner models, play a significant role in speech interface interaction. Yet we do not know what the core dimensions of this concept are. Taking a psycholexical approach, our paper is the first to identify the key dimensions that define partner models in speech agent interaction. Through a repertory grid study (N=21), a review of key subjective questionnaires, an expert review of resulting word pairs and an online study of 356 user of speech interfaces, we identify three key dimensions that make up a users' partner model: 1) perceptions toward competence and capability; 2) assessment of human-likeness; and 3) a system's perceived cognitive flexibility. We discuss the implications for partner modelling as a concept, emphasising the importance of salience and the dynamic nature of these perceptions.

Mixed cooperative-competitive control scenarios such as human-machine interaction with individual goals of the interacting partners are very challenging for reinforcement learning agents. In order to contribute towards intuitive human-machine collaboration, we focus on problems in the continuous state and control domain where no explicit communication is considered and the agents do not know the others' goals or control laws but only sense their control inputs retrospectively. Our proposed framework combines a learned partner model based on online data with a reinforcement learning agent that is trained in a simulated environment including the partner model. Thus, we overcome drawbacks of independent learners and, in addition, benefit from a reduced amount of real world data required for reinforcement learning which is vital in the human-machine context. We finally analyze an example that demonstrates the merits of our proposed framework which learns fast due to the simulated environment and adapts to the continuously changing partner due to the partner approximation. Keywords: Reinforcement Learning, Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Control, Opponent Modeling.