Recent breakthroughs in the analysis of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are mathematical runtime analyses of those algorithms which are intensively used in practice. So far, most of these results show the same performance as previously known for simpler algorithms like the GSEMO. The few results indicating advantages of the popular MOEAs share the same shortages: They only consider the problem of computing the full Pareto front, sometimes of algorithms enriched with newly invented mechanisms, and this on newly designed benchmarks. In this work, we overcome these shortcomings by analyzing how existing popular MOEAs approximate the Pareto front of the established LARGEFRONT benchmark. We prove that several popular MOEAs, including NSGA-II (with current crowding distance), NSGA-III, SMS-EMOA, and SPEA2, only need an expected time of O(n2 logn) fitness evaluations to compute an additive ω-approximation of the Pareto front of the LARGEFRONT benchmark. This contrasts with the already proven exponential runtime (with high probability) of the GSEMO on the same task. Our result is the first mathematical runtime analysis showing and explaining the superiority of popular MOEAs over simple ones like the GSEMO for the central task of computing good approximations to the Pareto front.

We study the multi-objective linear contextual bandit problem, where multiple possible conflicting objectives must be optimized simultaneously. We propose MOL-TS, the first Thompson Sampling algorithm with Pareto regret guarantees for this problem. Unlike standard approaches that compute an empirical Pareto front each round, MOL-TS samples parameters across objectives and efficiently selects an arm from a novel effective Pareto front, which accounts for repeated selections over time. Our analysis shows that MOL-TSachieves a worst-case Pareto regret bound of eO(d3/2 T), where dis the dimension of the feature vectors, T is the total number of rounds, matching the best known order for randomized linear bandit algorithms for single objective. Empirical results confirm the benefits of our proposed approach, demonstrating improved regret minimization and strong multi-objective performance.

Nowadays deep models are required to be versatile due to the increasing realistic needs. Multi-task learning (MTL) offers an efficient way for this purpose to learn multiple tasks simultaneously with a single model. However, prior MTL solutions often focus on resolving conflicts and imbalances during optimization, which may not outperform simple linear scalarization strategies [Xin et al., 2022]. Instead of altering the optimization trajectory, this paper leverages mode connectivity to efficiently approach the Pareto front and identify the desired trade-off point. Unlike Pareto Front Learning (PFL), which aims to align with the entire Pareto front, we focus on effectively and efficiently exploring optimal trade-offs. However, three challenges persist: (1) the low-loss path can neither fully traverse trade-offs nor align with user preference due to its randomness, (2) commonly adopted Bézier curves in mode connectivity are ill-suited to navigating the complex loss landscapes of deep models, and (3) poor scalability to large-scale task scenarios. To address these challenges, we adopt non-uniform rational B-Splines (NURBS) to model mode connectivity, allowing for more flexible and precise curve optimization. Additionally, we introduce an order-aware objective to explore task loss tradeoffs and employ a task grouping strategy to enhance scalability under massive task scenarios. Extensive experiments on key MTL datasets demonstrate that our proposed method, EXTRA(EXplore TRAde-offs), effectively identifies the desired point on the Pareto front and achieves state-of-the-art performance.

There is a well known intrinsic trade-off between the fairness of a representation and the performance of classifiers derived from the representation. In this paper we propose a new method to compute the optimal Pareto front of this trade off. In contrast to the existing methods, this approach does not require the training of complex fair representation models. Our approach is derived through three main steps: We analyze fair representations theoretically, and derive several structural properties of optimal representations. We then show that these properties enable a reduction of the computation of the Pareto Front to a compact discrete problem. Finally, we show that these compact approximating problems can be efficiently solved via off-the shelf concave-convex programming methods.

Bayesian Optimization (BO) is a powerful tool for optimizing expensive blackbox objective functions. While extensive research has been conducted on the single-objective optimization problem, the multi-objective optimization problem remains challenging. In this paper, we propose MOBO-OSD, a multi-objective Bayesian Optimization algorithm designed to generate a diverse set of Pareto optimal solutions by solving multiple constrained optimization problems, referred to as MOBO-OSD subproblems, along orthogonal search directions (OSDs) defined with respect to an approximated convex hull of individual objective minima. By employing a well-distributed set of OSDs, MOBO-OSD ensures broad coverage of the objective space, enhancing both solution diversity and hypervolume performance. To further improve the density of the set of Pareto optimal candidate solutions without requiring an excessive number of subproblems, we leverage a Pareto Front Estimation technique to generate additional solutions in the neighborhood of existing solutions. Additionally, MOBO-OSD supports batch optimization, enabling parallel function evaluations to accelerate the optimization process when resources are available. Through extensive experiments and analysis on a variety of synthetic and real-world benchmark functions with two to six objectives, we demonstrate that MOBO-OSD consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Offline multi-objective optimization aims to identify Pareto-optimal solutions given a dataset of designs and their objective values. In this work, we propose a preference-guided diffusion model that generates Pareto-optimal designs by leveraging a classifier-based guidance mechanism. Our guidance classifier is a preference model trained to predict the probability that one design dominates another, directing the diffusion model toward optimal regions of the design space. Crucially, this preference model generalizes beyond the training distribution, enabling the discovery of Pareto-optimal solutions outside the observed dataset. We introduce a novel diversity-aware preference guidance, augmenting Pareto dominance preference with diversity criteria. This ensures that generated solutions are optimal and well-distributed across the objective space, a capability absent in prior generative methods for offline multi-objective optimization. We evaluate our approach on various continuous offline multi-objective optimization tasks and find that it consistently outperforms other inverse/generative approaches while remaining competitive with forward/ surrogate-based optimization methods. Our results highlight the effectiveness of classifier-guided diffusion models in generating diverse and high-quality solutions that approximate the Pareto front well.

Recent breakthroughs in the analysis of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are mathematical runtime analyses of those algorithms which are intensively used in practice. So far, most of these results show the same performance as previously known for simpler algorithms like the GSEMO. The few results indicating advantages of the popular MOEAs share the same shortages: They only consider the problem of computing the full Pareto front, sometimes of algorithms enriched with newly invented mechanisms, and this on newly designed benchmarks. In this work, we overcome these shortcomings by analyzing how existing popular MOEAs approximate the Pareto front of the established LargeFront benchmark. We prove that several popular MOEAs, including NSGA-II (with current crowding distance), NSGA-III, SMS-EMOA, and SPEA2, only need an expected time of $O(n^2 \log n)$ fitness evaluations to compute an additive $\varepsilon$-approximation of the Pareto front of the LargeFront benchmark. This contrasts with the already proven exponential runtime (with high probability) of the GSEMO on the same task. Our result is the first mathematical runtime analysis showing and explaining the superiority of popular MOEAs over simple ones like the GSEMO for the central task of computing good approximations to the Pareto front.

We study the multi-objective linear contextual bandit problem, where multiple possible conflicting objectives must be optimized simultaneously. We propose $\texttt{MOL-TS}$, the first Thompson Sampling algorithm with Pareto regret guarantees for this problem. Unlike standard approaches that compute an empirical Pareto front each round, $\texttt{MOL-TS}$ samples parameters across objectives and efficiently selects an arm from a novel effective Pareto front, which accounts for repeated selections over time. Our analysis shows that $\texttt{MOL-TS}$ achieves a worst-case Pareto regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the feature vectors, $T$ is the total number of rounds, matching the best known order for randomized linear bandit algorithms for single objective. Empirical results confirm the benefits of our proposed approach, demonstrating improved regret minimization and strong multi-objective performance.

There is a well known intrinsic trade-off between the fairness of a representation and the performance of classifiers derived from the representation. In this paper we propose a new method to compute the optimal Pareto front of this trade off. In contrast to the existing methods, this approach does not require the training of complex fair representation models. Our approach is derived through three main steps: We analyze fair representations theoretically, and derive several structural properties of optimal representations. We then show that these properties enable a reduction of the computation of the Pareto Front to a compact discrete problem. Finally, we show that these compact approximating problems can be efficiently solved via off-the shelf concave-convex programming methods.

Artificial-intelligence systems are becoming ubiquitous in society, yet their predictions typically inherit biases with respect to protected attributes such as race, gender, or age. Classical fairness notions, most notably Statistical Parity (SP), demand that predictions be independent of the protected attributes, but are overly restrictive when these attributes influence mediating variables that are considered business necessities. Recent causal formulations relax SP by distinguishing allowed from not-allowed causal paths and by complementing SP with Predictive Parity (PP), requiring the predictor to replicate the legitimate influence of business-necessities. Existing path-based definitions are mainly practical when applied to categorical attributes. This paper introduces a new framework for fairness in structural causal models that is tailored to continuous protected attributes. We formalize SP and PP through path-specific partial derivatives, establish conditions under which these criteria coincide with prior causal definitions, and characterize when a fair predictor, one that satisfies SP along not-allowed paths while achieving PP along allowed paths, exists. Building on this theory, we propose a fair tuning algorithm that either constructs such a predictor or, when not possible, allows for a trade-off between SP and PP. We present experiments on simulated and real data to evaluate our proposal, compare it with previously proposed methods, and show that it performs better when PP is considered.