pairwise comparison
- Europe > Germany > Rhineland-Palatinate > Kaiserslautern (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games > Chess (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.92)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
Active preference learning for ordering items in-and out-of-sample Herman Bergström Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg hermanb@chalmers.se Emil Carlsson
Learning an ordering of items based on pairwise comparisons is useful when items are difficult to rate consistently on an absolute scale, for example, when annotators have to make subjective assessments. When exhaustive comparison is infeasible, actively sampling item pairs can reduce the number of annotations necessary for learning an accurate ordering. However, many algorithms ignore shared structure between items, limiting their sample efficiency and precluding generalization to new items. It is also common to disregard how noise in comparisons varies between item pairs, despite it being informative of item similarity. In this work, we study active preference learning for ordering items with contextual attributes, both in-and out-of-sample. We give an upper bound on the expected ordering error of a logistic preference model as a function of which items have been compared. Next, we propose an active learning strategy that samples items to minimize this bound by accounting for aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in comparisons. We evaluate the resulting algorithm, and a variant aimed at reducing model misspecification, in multiple realistic ordering tasks with comparisons made by human annotators. Our results demonstrate superior sample efficiency and generalization compared to non-contextual ranking approaches and active preference learning baselines.
- Europe > Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland > Gothenburg (0.40)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Asia > South Korea > Seoul > Seoul (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- North America > United States > Hawaii (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Asia > Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region > Dawei (0.04)
- Education (0.46)
- Banking & Finance > Economy (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (0.82)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.79)
- North America > United States > Ohio (0.04)
- North America > United States > Iowa (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > France > Pays de la Loire > Loire-Atlantique > Nantes (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Constraint-Based Reasoning (0.41)
- North America > United States > New York > Rensselaer County > Troy (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Hudson County > Hoboken (0.04)
- Asia > China > Tianjin Province > Tianjin (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- (9 more...)