orange block
- North America > United States > Arizona (0.05)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Planning & Scheduling (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (0.94)
- South America > Argentina > Pampas > Buenos Aires F.D. > Buenos Aires (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
- North America > United States > Arizona (0.05)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > Mexico > Gulf of Mexico (0.45)
- South America > Suriname > North Atlantic Ocean (0.13)
- Africa > Angola > Namibe Province > South Atlantic Ocean (0.13)
- (4 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
Deliberate Planning in Language Models with Symbolic Representation
Xiong, Siheng, Liu, Zhangding, Zhou, Jieyu, Su, Yusen
Planning remains a core challenge for large language models (LLMs), particularly in domains that require coherent multi-step action sequences grounded in external constraints. We introduce SymPlanner, a novel framework that equips LLMs with structured planning capabilities by interfacing them with a symbolic environment that serves as an explicit world model. Rather than relying purely on natural language reasoning, SymPlanner grounds the planning process in a symbolic state space, where a policy model proposes actions and a symbolic environment deterministically executes and verifies their effects. To enhance exploration and improve robustness, we introduce Iterative Correction (IC), which refines previously proposed actions by leveraging feedback from the symbolic environment to eliminate invalid decisions and guide the model toward valid alternatives. Additionally, Contrastive Ranking (CR) enables fine-grained comparison of candidate plans by evaluating them jointly. Conceptually, SymPlanner operationalizes two cognitive faculties: (i) error monitoring and repair via externalized feedback (IC) and (ii) preference formation among alternatives via pairwise comparison (CR), advancing cognitively plausible, symbol-grounded planning aligned with the rich structure in intelligent systems. We evaluate SymPlanner on PlanBench, demonstrating that it produces more coherent, diverse, and verifiable plans than pure natural language baselines.
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.04)
- North America > United States > Florida > Miami-Dade County > Miami (0.04)
HyperTree Planning: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Hierarchical Thinking
Gui, Runquan, Wang, Zhihai, Wang, Jie, Ma, Chi, Zhen, Huiling, Yuan, Mingxuan, Hao, Jianye, Lian, Defu, Chen, Enhong, Wu, Feng
Recent advancements have significantly enhanced the performance of large language models (LLMs) in tackling complex reasoning tasks, achieving notable success in domains like mathematical and logical reasoning. However, these methods encounter challenges with complex planning tasks, primarily due to extended reasoning steps, diverse constraints, and the challenge of handling multiple distinct sub-tasks. To address these challenges, we propose HyperTree Planning (HTP), a novel reasoning paradigm that constructs hypertree-structured planning outlines for effective planning. The hypertree structure enables LLMs to engage in hierarchical thinking by flexibly employing the divide-and-conquer strategy, effectively breaking down intricate reasoning steps, accommodating diverse constraints, and managing multiple distinct sub-tasks in a well-organized manner. We further introduce an autonomous planning framework that completes the planning process by iteratively refining and expanding the hypertree-structured planning outlines. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of HTP, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy on the TravelPlanner benchmark with Gemini-1.5-Pro, resulting in a 3.6 times performance improvement over o1-preview.
- North America > Mexico > Gulf of Mexico (1.00)
- Europe > Estonia > Harju County > Tallinn (0.05)
- North America > United States > Tennessee (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (1.00)