When minimizing makespan during off-line planning, the fastest action sequence to reach a particular state is, by definition, preferred. When trying to reach a goal quickly in on-line planning, previous work has inherited that assumption: the faster of two paths that both reach the same state is usually considered to dominate the slower one. In this short paper, we point out that, when planning happens concurrently with execution, selecting a slower action can allow additional time for planning, leading to better plans. We present Slo'RTS, a metareasoning planning algorithm that estimates whether the expected improvement in future decision-making from this increased planning time is enough to make up for the increased duration of the selected action. Using simple benchmarks, we show that Slo'RTS can yield shorter time-to-goal than a conventional planner. This generalizes previous work on metareasoning in on-line planning and highlights the inherent uncertainty present in an on-line setting.

Many AI systems, such as robots, must plan under time constraints. The most popular search approach applied in robotics so far is anytime search, in which the algorithm quickly finds a suboptimal plan, and then continues to find better and better plans as time passes, until eventually converging on an optimal plan. However, the time until the first plan is returned is not controllable, so such methods inherently involve idling the system's operation before `real' execution can begin. Real-time search methods provide hard real-time bounds on action selection time, yet to our knowledge, they have not yet been demonstrated for robotic systems. In this work, we compare anytime and real-time heuristic search methods in their ability to allow agents to achieve goals quickly.Our results suggest that real-time search is more broadly applicable and often achieves goals faster than anytime search, while anytime search finds shorter plans and does not suffer from dead-ends.