Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) achieve strong performance in node classification tasks but exhibit substantial performance degradation under label noise. Despite recent advances in noise-robust learning, a principled approach that exploits the node-neighbor interdependencies inherent in graph data for label noise detection remains underexplored. To address this gap, we propose GD2, a noise-aware Graph learning framework that detects label noise by leveraging Dual-view prediction Discrepancies. The framework contrasts the ego-view, constructed from node-specific features, with the structure-view, derived through the aggregation of neighboring representations.

In real world, the observed label distribution of a dataset often mismatches its true distribution due to noisy labels. In this situation, noisy labels learning (NLL) methods directly integrated with long-tailed learning (LTL) methods tend to fail due to a dilemma: NLL methods normally rely on unbiased model predictions to recover true distribution by selecting and correcting noisy labels; while LTL methods like logit adjustment depends on true distributions to adjust biased predictions, leading to a deadlock of mutual dependency defined in this paper. To address this, we propose Unlocker, a bilevel optimization framework that integrates NLL methods and LTL methods to iteratively disentangle this deadlock. The inner optimization leverages NLL to train the model, incorporating LTL methods to fairly select and correct noisy labels. The outer optimization adaptively determines an adjustment strength, mitigating model bias from over-or under-adjustment. We also theoretically prove that this bilevel optimization problem is convergent by transferring the outer optimization target to an equivalent problem with a closed-form solution. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in alleviating model bias and handling long-tailed noisy label data. Code is available at https://github.com/ChenShu248/Unlocker.

Network traffic classification is essential for network management and security. In recent years, deep learning (DL) algorithms have emerged as essential tools for classifying complex traffic. However, they rely heavily on high-quality labeled training data. In practice, traffic data is often noisy due to human error or inaccurate automated labeling, which could render classification unreliable and lead to severe consequences. Although some studies have alleviated the label noise issue in specific scenarios, they are difficult to generalize to general traffic classification tasks due to the inherent semantic complexity of traffic data.

Real-world classification datasets often contain label bias, where observed labels differ systematically from the true labels at different rates for different demographic groups. Machine learning models trained on such datasets may then exhibit disparities in predictive performance across these groups. In this work, we characterize the problem of learning fair classification models with respect to the underlying ground truth labels when given only label biased data. We focus on the particular fairness definition of group sufficiency, i.e. equal calibration of risk scores across protected groups. We theoretically show that enforcing fairness with respect to label biased data necessarily results in group miscalibration with respect to the true labels. We then propose a regularizer which minimizes an upper bound on the sufficiency gap by penalizing a conditional mutual information term. Across experiments on eight tabular, image, and text datasets with both synthetic and real label noise, we find that our method reduces the sufficiency gap by up to 7.2% with no significant decrease in overall accuracy.

Cross-modal hashing aims to efficiently retrieve information across different modalities by mapping data into compact hash codes. However, most existing methods assume access to fully accurate supervision, which rarely holds in real-world scenarios. In fact, annotations are often redundant, i.e., each sample is associated with a set of candidate labels that includes both ground-truth labels and redundant noisy labels. Treating all annotated labels as equally valid introduces two critical issues: (1) the sparse presence of true labels within the label set is not explicitly addressed, leading to overfitting on redundant noisy annotations; (2) redundant noisy labels induce spurious similarities that distort semantic alignment across modalities and degrade the quality of the hash space. To address these challenges, we propose that effective cross-modal hashing requires explicitly identifying and leveraging the true label subset within all candidate annotations.

The performance of learning-based object detection algorithms, which attempt to both classify and locate objects within images, is determined largely by the quality are prev of alent: the annotated objects that dataset are incorrectly used for training.

Retraining a model using its own predictions together with the original, potentially noisy labels is a well-known strategy for improving the model's performance. While prior works have demonstrated the benefits of specific heuristic retraining schemes, the question of how to optimally combine the model's predictions and the provided labels remains largely open.

Robust Federated Graph Learning (FGL) provides an effective decentralized framework for training Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in noisy-label environments. However, the subtlety of noise during training presents formidable obstacles for developing robust FGL systems. Previous robust FL approaches neither adequately constrain edge-mediated error propagation nor account for intra-class topological differences. At the client level, we innovatively demonstrate that hyperspherical embedding can effectively capture graph structures in a fine-grained manner. Correspondingly, our method effectively addresses the aforementioned issues through fine-grained hypersphere alignment. Moreover, we uncover undetected noise arising from localized perspective constraints and propose the geometricaware hyperspherical purification module at the server level. Combining both level strategies, we present our robust FGL framework, HYPERION, which operates all components within a unified hyperspherical space. HYPERION demonstrates remarkable robustness across multiple datasets, for instance, achieving a 29.7% F1-macro score with 50%-pair noise on Cora.

Conformal prediction is an emerging technique for uncertainty quantification that constructs prediction sets guaranteed to contain the true label with a predefined probability. Recent work develops online conformal prediction methods that adaptively construct prediction sets to accommodate distribution shifts. However, existing algorithms typically assume perfect label accuracy which rarely holds in practice. In this work, we investigate the robustness of online conformal prediction under uniform label noise with a known noise rate. We show that label noise causes a persistent gap between the actual mis-coverage rate and the desired rate α, leading to either overestimated or underestimated coverage guarantees. To address this issue, we propose a novel loss function robust pinball loss, which provides an unbiased estimate of clean pinball loss without requiring ground-truth labels. Theoretically, we demonstrate that robust pinball loss enables online conformal prediction to eliminate the coverage gap under uniform label noise, achieving a convergence rate of O(T 1/2) for both empirical and expected coverage errors (i.e., absolute deviation of the empirical and expected mis-coverage rate from the target level α). This loss offers a general solution to the uniform label noise, and is complementary to existing online conformal prediction methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate that robust pinball loss enhances the noise robustness of various online conformal prediction methods by achieving a precise coverage guarantee and improved efficiency.

Sample selection is a prevalent approach in learning with noisy labels, aiming to identify confident samples for training. Although existing sample selection methods have achieved decent results by reducing the noise rate of the selected subset, they often overlook that not all mislabeled examples harm the model's performance equally. In this paper, we demonstrate that mislabeled examples correctly predicted by the model early in the training process are particularly harmful to model performance. We refer to these examples as Mislabeled Easy Examples (MEEs). To address this, we propose Early Cutting, which introduces a recalibration step that employs the model's later training state to re-select the confident subset identified early in training, thereby avoiding misleading confidence from early learning and effectively filtering out MEEs. Experiments on the CIFAR, WebVision, and full ImageNet-1k datasets demonstrate that our method effectively improves sample selection and model performance by reducing MEEs.