In particular, we express generalization gap in terms of the power spectra of the sample design and that of the function to be learned.

We study the safe linear bandit problem, where an agent sequentially selects actions from a convex domain to maximize an unknown objective while ensuring unknown linear constraints are satisfied on a per-round basis. Existing approaches primarily rely on optimism-based methods with frequentist confidence bounds, often leading to computationally expensive action selection routines. We propose COnstrained Linear Thompson Sampling (COLTS), a sampling-based framework that efficiently balances regret minimization and constraint satisfaction by selecting actions on the basis of noisy perturbations of the estimates of the unknown objective vector and constraint matrix. We introduce three variants of COLTS, distinguished by the learner's available side information: - S-COLTS assumes access to a known safe action and ensures strict constraint enforcement by combining the COLTS approach with a rescaling towards the safe action. For $d$-dimensional actions, this yields $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ regret and zero constraint violations (or risk). - E-COLTS enforces constraints softly under Slater's condition, and attains regret and risk of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ by combining COLTS with uniform exploration. - R-COLTS requires no side information, and ensures instance-independent regret and risk of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ by leveraging repeated resampling. A key technical innovation is a coupled noise design, which maintains optimism while preserving computational efficiency, which is combined with a scaling based analysis technique to address the variation of the per-round feasible region induced by sampled constraint matrices. Our methods match the regret bounds of prior approaches, while significantly reducing computational costs compared to them, thus yielding a scalable and practical approach for constrained bandit linear optimization.

Preserving the topology from being inferred by external adversaries has become a paramount security issue for network systems (NSs), and adding random noises to the nodal states provides a promising way. Nevertheless, recent works have revealed that the topology cannot be preserved under i.i.d. noises in the asymptotic sense. How to effectively characterize the non-asymptotic preservation performance still remains an open issue. Inspired by the deviation quantification of concentration inequalities, this paper proposes a novel metric named trace-based variance-expectation ratio. This metric effectively captures the decaying rate of the topology inference error, where a slower rate indicates better non-asymptotic preservation performance. We prove that the inference error will always decay to zero asymptotically, as long as the added noises are non-increasing and independent (milder than the i.i.d. condition). Then, the optimal noise design that produces the slowest decaying rate for the error is obtained. More importantly, we amend the noise design by introducing one-lag time dependence, achieving the zero state deviation and the non-zero topology inference error in the asymptotic sense simultaneously. Extensions to a general class of noises with multi-lag time dependence are provided. Comprehensive simulations verify the theoretical findings.