Most methods for finding a Nash equilibrium rely on procedures that operate over the entire action space, making them infeasible for settings with too many actions to be searched exhaustively. Randomised search heuristics such as coevolutionary algorithms offer benefits in such settings, however they lack many of the theoretical guarantees established for exhaustive methods such as zero-regret learning. We address this by developing a method for proving necessary and sufficient conditions for a coevolutionary algorithm to be stable, in the sense that it reliably retains a Nash equilibrium following discovery. As the method provides bounds that are adapted to both application and algorithm instance, it can be used as a practical tool for parameter configuration. We additionally show how bounds on regret may be deduced from our results and undertake corresponding empirical analysis.

Deep generative models, particularly diffusion models, have achieved remarkable success but face significant challenges when trained on real-world, long-tailed datasets-where few "head" classes dominate and many "tail" classes are underrepresented. This paper develops a theoretical framework for long-tailed learning via diffusion models through the lens of deep mutual learning. We introduce a novel regularized training objective that combines the standard diffusion loss with a mutual learning term, enabling balanced performance across all class labels, including the underrepresented tails. Our approach to learn via the proposed regularized objective is to formulate it as a multi-player game, with Nash equilibrium serving as the solution concept. We derive a non-asymptotic first-order convergence result for individual gradient descent algorithm to find the Nash equilibrium.

Equilibrium learning in adversarial games is an important topic widely examined in the fields of game theory and reinforcement learning (RL). Pursuit-evasion game (PEG), as an important class of real-world games from the fields of robotics and security, requires exponential time to be accurately solved. When the underlying graph structure varies, even the state-of-the-art RL methods require recomputation or at least fine-tuning, which can be time-consuming and impair real-time applicability. This paper proposes an Equilibrium Policy Generalization (EPG) framework to effectively learn a generalized policy with robust cross-graph zeroshot performance. In the context of PEGs, our framework is generally applicable to both pursuer and evader sides in both no-exit and multi-exit scenarios.

In this paper, we examine the robustness of Nash equilibria in continuous games, under both strategic and dynamic uncertainty. Starting with the former, we introduce the notion of a robust equilibrium as those equilibria that remain invariant to small--but otherwise arbitrary--perturbations to the game's payoff structure, and we provide a crisp geometric characterization thereof. Subsequently, we turn to the question of dynamic robustness, and we examine which equilibria may arise as stable limit points of the dynamics of "follow the regularized leader" (FTRL) in the presence of randomness and uncertainty. Despite their very distinct origins, we establish a structural correspondence between these two notions of robustness: strategic robustness implies dynamic robustness, and, conversely, the requirement of strategic robustness cannot be relaxed if dynamic robustness is to be maintained. Finally, we examine the rate of convergence to robust equilibria as a function of the underlying regularizer, and we show that entropically regularized learning converges at a geometric rate in games with affinely constrained action spaces.

Deep generative models, particularly diffusion models, have achieved remarkable success but face significant challenges when trained on real-world, long-tailed datasets-where few head classes dominate and many tail classes are underrepresented. This paper develops a theoretical framework for long-tailed learning via diffusion models through the lens of deep mutual learning. We introduce a novel regularized training objective that combines the standard diffusion loss with a mutual learning term, enabling balanced performance across all class labels, including the underrepresented tails. Our approach to learn via the proposed regularized objective is to formulate it as a multi-player game, with Nash equilibrium serving as the solution concept. We derive a non-asymptotic first-order convergence result for individual gradient descent algorithm to find the Nash equilibrium. We show that the Nash gap of the score network obtained from the algorithm is upper bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{T_{train}}}+\beta)$ where $\beta$ is the regularizing parameter and $T_{train}$ is the number of iterations of the training algorithm. Furthermore, we theoretically establish hyper-parameters for training and sampling algorithm that ensure that we find conditional score networks (under our model) with a worst case sampling error $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon+1), \forall \epsilon> 0$ across all class labels. Our results offer insights and guarantees for training diffusion models on imbalanced, long-tailed data, with implications for fairness, privacy, and generalization in real-world generative modeling scenarios.

In this paper, we examine the long-run behavior of regularized, no-regret learning in1 finite games. A well-known result in the field states that the empirical frequencies2 of no-regret play converge to the game's set of coarse correlated equilibria; however,3 our understanding of how the players' actual strategies evolve over time is much4 more limited - and, in many cases, non-existent. This issue is exacerbated by5 a series of recent results showing that only strict Nash equilibria are stable and6 attracting under regularized learning, thus making the relation between learning7 and pointwise solution concepts particularly elusive. In lieu of this, we take a more8 general approach and instead seek to characterize the setwise rationality properties9 of the players' day-to-day play. To that end, we focus on one of the most stringent10 criteria of setwise strategic stability, namely that any unilateral deviation from the11 set in question incurs a cost to the deviator - a property known as closedness under12 better replies (club).

Adversarial risk quantifies the performance of classifiers on adversarially perturbed data. Numerous definitions of adversarial risk--not all mathematically rigorous and differing subtly in the details--have appeared in the literature. In this paper, we revisit these definitions, make them rigorous, and critically examine their similarities and differences. Our technical tools derive from optimal transport, robust statistics, functional analysis, and game theory. Our contributions include the following: generalizing Strassen's theorem to the unbalanced optimal transport setting with applications to adversarial classification with unequal priors; showing an equivalence between adversarial robustness and robust hypothesis testing with -Wasserstein uncertainty sets; proving the existence of a pure Nash equilibrium in the two-player game between the adversary and the algorithm; and characterizing adversarial risk by the minimum Bayes error between a pair of distributions belonging to the -Wasserstein uncertainty sets. Our results generalize and deepen recently discovered connections between optimal transport and adversarial robustness and reveal new connections to Choquet capacities and game theory.