Radio signal recognition is a crucial function in electronic warfare. Precise identification and localisation of radar pulse activities are required by electronic warfare systems to produce effective countermeasures. Despite the importance of these tasks, deep learning-based radar pulse activity recognition methods have remained largely underexplored. While deep learning for radar modulation recognition has been explored previously, classification tasks are generally limited to short and non-interleaved IQ signals, limiting their applicability to military applications. To address this gap, we introduce an end-to-end multi-stage learning approach to detect and localise pulse activities of interleaved radar signals across an extended time horizon. We propose a simple, yet highly effective multi-stage architecture for incrementally predicting fine-grained segmentation masks that localise radar pulse activities across multiple channels. We demonstrate the performance of our approach against several reference models on a novel radar dataset, while also providing a first-of-its-kind benchmark for radar pulse activity segmentation.

Aims. The purpose of this study is to create a multi-stage machine learning model to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response for heart failure (HF) patients. This model exploits uncertainty quantification to recommend additional collection of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) variables if baseline clinical variables and features from electrocardiogram (ECG) are not sufficient. Methods. 218 patients who underwent rest-gated SPECT MPI were enrolled in this study. CRT response was defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 5% at a 6 month follow-up. A multi-stage ML model was created by combining two ensemble models. Results. The response rate for CRT was 55.5% (n = 121) with overall male gender 61.0% (n = 133), an average age of 62.0, and LVEF of 27.7. The multi-stage model performed similarly to Ensemble 2 (which utilized the additional SPECT data) with AUC of 0.75 vs. 0.77, accuracy of 0.71 vs. 0.69, sensitivity of 0.70 vs. 0.72, and specificity 0.72 vs. 0.65, respectively. However, the multi-stage model only required SPECT MPI data for 52.7% of the patients across all folds. Conclusions. By using rule-based logic stemming from uncertainty quantification, the multi-stage model was able to reduce the need for additional SPECT MPI data acquisition without sacrificing performance.