multi-label learning
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.97)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
- Asia > China > Hubei Province > Wuhan (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > China > Jiangsu Province > Nanjing (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Europe > Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 15 > Improvement District No. 9 > Banff (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Asia > Macao (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Dallas County > Dallas (0.04)
- North America > United States > Oregon > Multnomah County > Portland (0.04)
- (8 more...)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.46)
Multi-Label Learning with Pairwise Relevance Ordering
Precisely annotating objects with multiple labels is costly and has become a critical bottleneck in real-world multi-label classification tasks. Instead, deciding the relative order of label pairs is obviously less laborious than collecting exact labels. However, the supervised information of pairwise relevance ordering is less informative than exact labels. It is thus an important challenge to effectively learn with such weak supervision. In this paper, we formalize this problem as a novel learning framework, called multi-label learning with pairwise relevance ordering (PRO). We show that the unbiased estimator of classification risk can be derived with a cost-sensitive loss only from PRO examples. Theoretically, we provide the estimation error bound for the proposed estimator and further prove that it is consistent with respective to the commonly used ranking loss. Empirical studies on multiple datasets and metrics validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.