Collaborating Authors

model selection

Study suggests that AI model selection might introduce bias


Register for a free or VIP pass today. The past several years have made it clear that AI and machine learning are not a panacea when it comes to fair outcomes. Applying algorithmic solutions to social problems can magnify biases against marginalized peoples; undersampling populations always results in worse predictive accuracy. But bias in AI doesn't arise from the datasets alone. Problem formulation, or the way researchers fit tasks to AI techniques, can contribute.

Catastrophic Forgetting in Deep Graph Networks: an Introductory Benchmark for Graph Classification Artificial Intelligence

In this work, we study the phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting in Building a robust machine learning model that incrementally learns the graph representation learning scenario. The primary objective from different tasks without forgetting requires methodologies of the analysis is to understand whether classical continual learning that account for drifts in the input distribution. The Continual techniques for flat and sequential data have a tangible impact on Learning (CL) research field addresses the catastrophic forgetting performances when applied to graph data. To do so, we experiment problem [15, 16] by devising learning algorithms that improve a with a structure-agnostic model and a deep graph network in a model's ability to retain previously gathered information. As of robust and controlled environment on three different datasets. The today, CL methods have been studied from the perspective of flat benchmark is complemented by an investigation on the effect of data [24, 28, 39] and, to a lesser extent, sequential data [11, 40].

LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learning Artificial Intelligence

This paper studies task adaptive pre-trained model selection, an \emph{underexplored} problem of assessing pre-trained models so that models suitable for the task can be selected from the model zoo without fine-tuning. A pilot work~\cite{nguyen_leep:_2020} addressed the problem in transferring supervised pre-trained models to classification tasks, but it cannot handle emerging unsupervised pre-trained models or regression tasks. In pursuit of a practical assessment method, we propose to estimate the maximum evidence (marginalized likelihood) of labels given features extracted by pre-trained models. The maximum evidence is \emph{less prone to over-fitting} than the likelihood, and its \emph{expensive computation can be dramatically reduced} by our carefully designed algorithm. The Logarithm of Maximum Evidence (LogME) can be used to assess pre-trained models for transfer learning: a pre-trained model with high LogME is likely to have good transfer performance. LogME is fast, accurate, and general, characterizing it as \emph{the first practical assessment method for transfer learning}. Compared to brute-force fine-tuning, LogME brings over $3000\times$ speedup in wall-clock time. It outperforms prior methods by a large margin in their setting and is applicable to new settings that prior methods cannot deal with. It is general enough to diverse pre-trained models (supervised pre-trained and unsupervised pre-trained), downstream tasks (classification and regression), and modalities (vision and language). Code is at \url{}.

Nonstochastic Bandits with Infinitely Many Experts Machine Learning

We study the problem of nonstochastic bandits with infinitely many experts: A learner aims to maximize the total reward by taking actions sequentially based on bandit feedback while benchmarking against a countably infinite set of experts. We propose a variant of Exp4.P that, for finitely many experts, enables inference of correct expert rankings while preserving the order of the regret upper bound. We then incorporate the variant into a meta-algorithm that works on infinitely many experts. We prove a high-probability upper bound of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}} \big( i^*K + \sqrt{KT} \big)$ on the regret, up to polylog factors, where $i^*$ is the unknown position of the best expert, $K$ is the number of actions, and $T$ is the time horizon. We also provide an example of structured experts and discuss how to expedite learning in such case. Our meta-learning algorithm achieves the tightest regret upper bound for the setting considered when $i^* = \tilde{\mathcal{O}} \big( \sqrt{T/K} \big)$. If a prior distribution is assumed to exist for $i^*$, the probability of satisfying a tight regret bound increases with $T$, the rate of which can be fast.

Bayesian hierarchical stacking Machine Learning

Stacking is a widely used model averaging technique that yields asymptotically optimal prediction among all linear averages. We show that stacking is most effective when the model predictive performance is heterogeneous in inputs, so that we can further improve the stacked mixture with a hierarchical model. With the input-varying yet partially-pooled model weights, hierarchical stacking improves average and conditional predictions. Our Bayesian formulation includes constant-weight (complete-pooling) stacking as a special case. We generalize to incorporate discrete and continuous inputs, other structured priors, and time-series and longitudinal data. We demonstrate on several applied problems.

Adjusted chi-square test for degree-corrected block models Machine Learning

We propose a goodness-of-fit test for degree-corrected stochastic block models (DCSBM). The test is based on an adjusted chi-square statistic for measuring equality of means among groups of $n$ multinomial distributions with $d_1,\dots,d_n$ observations. In the context of network models, the number of multinomials, $n$, grows much faster than the number of observations, $d_i$, hence the setting deviates from classical asymptotics. We show that a simple adjustment allows the statistic to converge in distribution, under null, as long as the harmonic mean of $\{d_i\}$ grows to infinity. This result applies to large sparse networks where the role of $d_i$ is played by the degree of node $i$. Our distributional results are nonasymptotic, with explicit constants, providing finite-sample bounds on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance to the target distribution. When applied sequentially, the test can also be used to determine the number of communities. The test operates on a (row) compressed version of the adjacency matrix, conditional on the degrees, and as a result is highly scalable to large sparse networks. We incorporate a novel idea of compressing the columns based on a $(K+1)$-community assignment when testing for $K$ communities. This approach increases the power in sequential applications without sacrificing computational efficiency, and we prove its consistency in recovering the number of communities. Since the test statistic does not rely on a specific alternative, its utility goes beyond sequential testing and can be used to simultaneously test against a wide range of alternatives outside the DCSBM family. We show the effectiveness of the approach by extensive numerical experiments with simulated and real data. In particular, applying the test to the Facebook-100 dataset, we find that a DCSBM with a small number of communities is far from a good fit in almost all cases.

Regret Bound Balancing and Elimination for Model Selection in Bandits and RL Machine Learning

We propose a simple model selection approach for algorithms in stochastic bandit and reinforcement learning problems. As opposed to prior work that (implicitly) assumes knowledge of the optimal regret, we only require that each base algorithm comes with a candidate regret bound that may or may not hold during all rounds. In each round, our approach plays a base algorithm to keep the candidate regret bounds of all remaining base algorithms balanced, and eliminates algorithms that violate their candidate bound. We prove that the total regret of this approach is bounded by the best valid candidate regret bound times a multiplicative factor. This factor is reasonably small in several applications, including linear bandits and MDPs with nested function classes, linear bandits with unknown misspecification, and LinUCB applied to linear bandits with different confidence parameters. We further show that, under a suitable gap-assumption, this factor only scales with the number of base algorithms and not their complexity when the number of rounds is large enough. Finally, unlike recent efforts in model selection for linear stochastic bandits, our approach is versatile enough to also cover cases where the context information is generated by an adversarial environment, rather than a stochastic one.

DiffPrune: Neural Network Pruning with Deterministic Approximate Binary Gates and $L_0$ Regularization Machine Learning

Modern neural network architectures typically have many millions of parameters and can be pruned significantly without substantial loss in effectiveness which demonstrates they are over-parameterized. The contribution of this work is two-fold. The first is a method for approximating a multivariate Bernoulli random variable by means of a deterministic and differentiable transformation of any real-valued multivariate random variable. The second is a method for model selection by element-wise multiplication of parameters with approximate binary gates that may be computed deterministically or stochastically and take on exact zero values. Sparsity is encouraged by the inclusion of a surrogate regularization to the $L_0$ loss. Since the method is differentiable it enables straightforward and efficient learning of model architectures by an empirical risk minimization procedure with stochastic gradient descent and theoretically enables conditional computation during training. The method also supports any arbitrary group sparsity over parameters or activations and therefore offers a framework for unstructured or flexible structured model pruning. To conclude experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

How to Identify Overfitting Machine Learning Models in Scikit-Learn


Overfitting is a common explanation for the poor performance of a predictive model. An analysis of learning dynamics can help to identify whether a model has overfit the training dataset and may suggest an alternate configuration to use that could result in better predictive performance. Performing an analysis of learning dynamics is straightforward for algorithms that learn incrementally, like neural networks, but it is less clear how we might perform the same analysis with other algorithms that do not learn incrementally, such as decision trees, k-nearest neighbors, and other general algorithms in the scikit-learn machine learning library. In this tutorial, you will discover how to identify overfitting for machine learning models in Python. Identify Overfitting Machine Learning Models With Scikit-Learn Photo by Bonnie Moreland, some rights reserved.

Measure Theoretic Approach to Nonuniform Learnability Machine Learning

An earlier introduced characterization of nonuniform learnability that allows the sample size to depend on the hypothesis to which the learner is compared has been redefined using the measure-theoretic approach. Where nonuniform learnability is a strict relaxation of the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework. Introduction of a new algorithm, Generalize Measure Learnability framework (GML), to implement this approach with the study of its sample and computational complexity bounds. Like the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle, this approach can be regarded as an explication of Occam's razor. Furthermore, many situations were presented (Hypothesis Classes that are countable where we can apply the GML framework) which we can learn to use the GML scheme and can achieve statistical consistency.