Virtual Reality (VR) is quickly establishing itself in various industries, including training, education, medicine, and entertainment, in which users are frequently required to carry out multiple complex cognitive and physical activities. However, the relationship between cognitive activities, physical activities, and familiar feelings of cybersickness is not well understood and thus can be unpredictable for developers. Researchers have previously provided labeled datasets for predicting cybersickness while users are stationary, but there have been few labeled datasets on cybersickness while users are physically walking. Thus, from 39 participants, we collected head orientation, head position, eye tracking, images, physiological readings from external sensors, and the self-reported cybersickness severity, physical load, and mental load in VR. Throughout the data collection, participants navigated mazes via real walking and performed tasks challenging their attention and working memory. To demonstrate the dataset's utility, we conducted a case study of training classifiers in which we achieved 95% accuracy for cybersickness severity classification. The noteworthy performance of the straightforward classifiers makes this dataset ideal for future researchers to develop cybersickness detection and reduction models. To better understand the features that helped with classification, we performed SHAP(SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, highlighting the importance of eye tracking and physiological measures for cybersickness prediction while walking. This open dataset can allow future researchers to study the connection between cybersickness and cognitive loads and develop prediction models. This dataset will empower future VR developers to design efficient and effective Virtual Environments by improving cognitive load management and minimizing cybersickness.

Proper training and analytics in eSports require accurately collected and annotated data. Most eSports research focuses exclusively on in-game data analysis, and there is a lack of prior work involving eSports athletes' psychophysiological data. In this paper, we present a dataset collected from professional and amateur teams in 22 matches in League of Legends video game. Recorded data include the players' physiological activity, e.g. movements, pulse, saccades, obtained from various sensors, self-reported after-match survey, and in-game data. An important feature of the dataset is simultaneous data collection from five players, which facilitates the analysis of sensor data on a team level. Upon the collection of dataset we carried out its validation. In particular, we demonstrate that stress and concentration levels for professional players are less correlated, meaning more independent playstyle. Also, we show that the absence of team communication does not affect the professional players as much as amateur ones. To investigate other possible use cases of the dataset, we have trained classical machine learning algorithms for skill prediction and player re-identification using 3-minute sessions of sensor data. Best models achieved 0.856 and 0.521 (0.10 for a chance level) accuracy scores on a validation set for skill prediction and player re-id problems, respectively. The dataset is available at https://github.com/asmerdov/eSports_Sensors_Dataset.

PLM software is hard to interact with. I think the hardest part is PLM workflows. Usually very sophisticated it creates a complex jungle of choice, buttons and diagrams. But if you think about it, the goal is pretty simple – to communicate with people about information and decision making process. Existing workflows applications are hard.