We present AB-VINS, a different kind of visual-inertial SLAM system. Unlike most VINS systems which only use hand-crafted techniques, AB-VINS makes use of three different deep networks. Instead of estimating sparse feature positions, AB-VINS only estimates the scale and bias parameters (a and b) of monocular depth maps, as well as other terms to correct the depth using multi-view information which results in a compressed feature state. Despite being an optimization-based system, the main VIO thread of AB-VINS surpasses the efficiency of a state-of-the-art filter-based method while also providing dense depth. While state-of-the-art loop-closing SLAM systems have to relinearize a number of variables linear the number of keyframes, AB-VINS can perform loop closures while only affecting a constant number of variables. This is due to a novel data structure called the memory tree, in which the keyframe poses are defined relative to each other rather than all in one global frame, allowing for all but a few states to be fixed. AB-VINS is not as accurate as state-of-the-art VINS systems, but it is shown through careful experimentation to be more robust.

Extractive summaries are usually presented as lists of sentences with no expected cohesion between them and with plenty of redundant information if not accounted for. In this paper, we investigate the trade-offs incurred when aiming to control for inter-sentential cohesion and redundancy in extracted summaries, and their impact on their informativeness. As case study, we focus on the summarization of long, highly redundant documents and consider two optimization scenarios, reward-guided and with no supervision. In the reward-guided scenario, we compare systems that control for redundancy and cohesion during sentence scoring. In the unsupervised scenario, we introduce two systems that aim to control all three properties -- informativeness, redundancy, and cohesion -- in a principled way. Both systems implement a psycholinguistic theory that simulates how humans keep track of relevant content units and how cohesion and non-redundancy constraints are applied in short-term memory during reading. Extensive automatic and human evaluations reveal that systems optimizing for -- among other properties -- cohesion are capable of better organizing content in summaries compared to systems that optimize only for redundancy, while maintaining comparable informativeness. We find that the proposed unsupervised systems manage to extract highly cohesive summaries across varying levels of document redundancy, although sacrificing informativeness in the process. Finally, we lay evidence as to how simulated cognitive processes impact the trade-off between the analyzed summary properties.

Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials based on longitudinal patient electronic health records (EHR) data and eligibility criteria of clinical trials. However, they either depend on trial-specific expert rules that cannot expand to other trials or perform matching at a very general level with a black-box model where the lack of interpretability makes the model results difficult to be adopted. To provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching, we introduce a personalized dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT. It utilizes hierarchical clinical ontologies to expand the personalized patient representation learned from sequential EHR data, and then uses an attentional beam-search query learned from eligibility criteria embedding to offer a granular level of alignment for improved performance and interpretability. We evaluated TREEMENT against existing models on real-world datasets and demonstrated that TREEMENT outperforms the best baseline by 7% in terms of error reduction in criteria-level matching and achieves state-of-the-art results in its trial-level matching ability. Furthermore, we also show TREEMENT can offer good interpretability to make the model results easier for adoption.

The problem of human speech modeling has been solved more than once, but each time it faced paradoxes and contradictions. The scientific approach was initiated by Boolean algebra, which transgressed into logic of predicates. The human speech is more complicated than the predicate logic, but at the same time it is free of paradoxes, which occur at the first or higher orders. This article is an attempt to solve certain problems by introducing special restrictions. Speech analysis will be done in some consecutive stages. We should create automata, which can work over context-sensitive grammer, at first. This grammer will be defined in section 2. This definition based on concept of mask, which is responsible to symbol from ingress aphabet. The automata's transition function devides on some parts, which has specific logic operations over its. The main difference with previous studies is the specific function Φ, which can represent any class as data and some data as the class.