matroid constraint
- North America > United States (0.28)
- Europe > Germany > Rhineland-Palatinate > Kaiserslautern (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Banking & Finance (1.00)
- Government (0.68)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- South America > Brazil (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- South America > Brazil > Rio de Janeiro > Rio de Janeiro (0.04)
- North America > United States > Oregon > Multnomah County > Portland (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence (0.70)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (0.47)
Discretely beyond 1/e : Guided Combinatorial Algortihms for Submodular Maximization
For constrained, not necessarily monotone submodular maximization, all known approximation algorithms with ratio greater than $1/e$ require continuous ideas, such as queries to the multilinear extension of a submodular function and its gradient, which are typically expensive to simulate with the original set function. For combinatorial algorithms, the best known approximation ratios for both size and matroid constraint are obtained by a simple randomized greedy algorithm of Buchbinder et al. [9]: $1/e \approx 0.367$ for size constraint and $0.281$ for the matroid constraint in $\mathcal O (kn)$ queries, where $k$ is the rank of the matroid. In this work, we develop the first combinatorial algorithms to break the $1/e$ barrier: we obtain approximation ratio of $0.385$ in $\mathcal O (kn)$ queries to the submodular set function for size constraint, and $0.305$ for a general matroid constraint. These are achieved by guiding the randomized greedy algorithm with a fast local search algorithm. Further, we develop deterministic versions of these algorithms, maintaining the same ratio and asymptotic time complexity. Finally, we develop a deterministic, nearly linear time algorithm with ratio $0.377$.
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > Utah (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Mexico > Bernalillo County > Albuquerque (0.04)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- (3 more...)